Ask HN: What Roles/Skills Do You Struggle to Hire For?
50 points| rio517 | 4 years ago
I'm curious which roles / skills others find most difficult to hire and details on why.
50 points| rio517 | 4 years ago
I'm curious which roles / skills others find most difficult to hire and details on why.
[+] [-] newaccount74|4 years ago|reply
But the people looking for jobs are looking for a very specific role. Eg. they want a job as a developer, or as a graphic designer, and it's kinda hard to find someone who can do more than just one thing. But as a small company I don't really have enough work for a full time employee who does just one thing.
Most of the people I met who are good at more than one thing had their own business or startup and weren't looking for a job.
[+] [-] david38|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] leroman|4 years ago|reply
He's better off getting a job with some BigCorp really.. can't blame them.
[+] [-] akudha|4 years ago|reply
The reason it is hard to hire such people is low pay. Why would I want to wear multiple hats (and take on extra stress, even if I love the job) when I can walk across the street and get higher salary for a bit more boring role?
Of course I don’t know how much you’re paying, I am just pointing out the general case here.
[+] [-] sdrothrock|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] osullip|4 years ago|reply
I have done this several times in my life - it's amazing when two people, willing to do literally any job that is needed, get together. Pretty powerful combination.
[+] [-] hackerfromthefu|4 years ago|reply
In other words such a person delivers a higher amount of value, above the individual tasks done, by saving you time on coordination and hiring.
I'm wondering if your offers are reflecting this value that a multi-skilled person would provide you? Or do you expect to get the benefit of their extra skills for free while they don't benefit from their own skillset, which they must have spent a lot of time learning?
[+] [-] topicseed|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] notRobot|4 years ago|reply
If this sounds interesting, please share your contact info, or drop me an email (address in profile)!
[+] [-] elwesties|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Apreche|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] specterhead|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lbriner|4 years ago|reply
The main background issue is a lack of supply if you are not in a place to hire worldwide remote (which many companies are not).
As a small company, doing the communications required for doing recruitment all in-house, as well as getting your job listings out to where people will find them is hard. However, using Recruiters is expensive and they have less ability to do quality filtering of applicants, especially since they are driven by commission more than quality so I think they would rather get us to interview someone who isn't a great match "just in case".
[+] [-] Nextgrid|4 years ago|reply
I always say that when it comes to lack of candidates there's this magical thing called "money" where if you throw more of it on the table the problem suddenly resolves itself.
Recruiters and getting your job ad in front of more people is only needed when it's a hard sell; if it's an offer most people can't refuse then you just have to show it to a handful of people before you get someone who agrees.
[+] [-] phekunde|4 years ago|reply
Me: "I am looking for a tech co-founder; the startup is at an ideation stage, and I have already talked to people who have shown interest in the project. I think having a tech co-founder at this stage will help a lot."
Listener: "How much are you paying for the role?"
Me: "This is an equity-based role because the startup is at an early stage."
Listener: "So you want people to work for you for free??"
This doesn't matter if the listener is an engineer or not. In the UK, there is little understanding of how very early stage startups work. It is equity based, that concept does not go down very well with the population.
[+] [-] tsm|4 years ago|reply
At some point my hand will be forced if I need a visa sponsorship, but for now it's a pretty tough sell.
[+] [-] pyb|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sshine|4 years ago|reply
What prevents you (or others) from hiring remote?
[+] [-] sage76|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] GianFabien|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ManOfLand|4 years ago|reply
A founder-mentality developer. A great developer who's willing to take a pay cut for a larger amount of equity. Competition is fierce, and we're not in crypto :'(
[+] [-] jamil7|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] drudoo|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sam_lowry_|4 years ago|reply
I switched been Software Architect and Individual Contributor roles a few times. the pay difference does not really match the increase of responsibility for this position, you have to be willing to communicate, lead and challenge others and have fun doing it to be a successful Software Architect.
[+] [-] hackerfromthefu|4 years ago|reply
May be looking for a new role in a few months time should I find one fully remote with US level pay, if this might be a good match should I get in touch with you?
[+] [-] Fire-Dragon-DoL|4 years ago|reply
By open-minded I refer to the ability to evaluate and challenge everything that "the community does this", evaluate it in the context of a team/company and suggest the best approach given the specific team conditions, without the presumption that the Rails community is right by default fir every usecase in the world.
Bonus points if the person is interested in software design and even system architecture.
[+] [-] Agingcoder|4 years ago|reply
These people are invaluable, but are very hard to come by.
[+] [-] gremlinsinc|4 years ago|reply
Programming is burning me out, I'd kill for a position where I can just take a salary and/or stock to basically work on writing technical docs/blog posts, deployment systems for devops, or figuring out features or setting up systems to track user feedback to figure out what users want added.
I mean, I'd still jump in and code, I just would like some options to expand my horizons. As a freelancer I haven't been able to find that and I'm tired of applying/interviewing for remote positions.
Maybe I'd be a better CTO than developer or a Project or Product Manager. Hell, I've even thought of just jumping to devops or QA just for a scene change.
[+] [-] jitl|4 years ago|reply
(If this sounds interesting to any readers, send me an email at [email protected] or twitter DM @jitl)
[1]: https://www.notion.so/blog/data-model-behind-notion
[+] [-] Apreche|4 years ago|reply
There’s also a corollary problem. The few places that do want my depth almost always want it because they are understaffed. They want to overwork me, and I refuse to ever work more than 40 hours a week under any circumstance.
[+] [-] hackerfromthefu|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] arboghast|4 years ago|reply
I’m talking months to find someone. Many candidates apply and look good on paper but turn out to just lie and made us waste many hours of interviews.
As for the why, I suspect one of the following:
- good candidates already have a job they love
- people are not willing to relocate (job is remote but inside one of the countries we are operating in, which is 80)
- there is simply not enough people in the field, which goes back to my first point
[+] [-] SCHiM|4 years ago|reply
The job is frustrating because many socs are beholden to central IT to fix even high severity issues, this generates a lot of friction. Most organizations have a big feed of alerts that trigger on everything from ransomware, to a user plugging in a razor mouse... This makes the job frustrating and boring. Contrast this to red team positions. If they're lucky they get to cowboy all through the network never asking permission after initial sign-of. And why would they? Nobody spots what they're doing anyway, as long as you don't create problems in prod.
[+] [-] LAC-Tech|4 years ago|reply
If you hire contractors you can hire people from anywhere - you don't need a business presence.
(This message is brought to you by a contractor living in the middle of nowhere).
[+] [-] MattGaiser|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] machiaweliczny|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] t3ssel|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MattPalmer1086|4 years ago|reply
It's not that hard to find architects, but it's insanely hard to find good ones. Although, that probably applies to pretty much any role.
[+] [-] hackerfromthefu|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] joker99|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] the_only_law|4 years ago|reply
I’m guessing it’s an overall supply issue. It kinda seems like you have to accidentally end up working for an OEM or MS early on in your career, I’ve seen very few kernel dev jobs and almost always very senior
Otherwise, it’s not particularly amenable to hobbyists, while you can download the WDK, write and test drivers, you’re still kinda limited by the EV cert requirement and the fee communities out there with knowledge in this subject can be less than helpful sometimes (to the contrary Thou, I’ve gotten help from actually MS guys working on NDIS over on stack overflow and they were great).
Docs are ok, but depending on where you are can degrade pretty badly. There are a few things that aren’t well introduced. I didn’t actually understand INF files until stumbling across an ancient blogpost that spelled them out and I was rather horrified by what I learned.
[+] [-] hackerfromthefu|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mooreds|4 years ago|reply
$CURJOB has a downloadable product, which is a different world than the SaaS jobs that are prevalent these days.
[+] [-] relaunched|4 years ago|reply
Assessor's that aren't just tool operators. Security architects that can threat model and deliver requirements, in the design phase. Anyone that has intersectional experience between security and external compliance is also a problem.
[+] [-] igetspam|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] phekunde|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ramoz|4 years ago|reply
Sr Frontend Engineer that can solve for complex logic as well as make things look good.
[+] [-] revskill|4 years ago|reply
Because it's hard to master the CSS systematically.
[+] [-] kureikain|4 years ago|reply
- ui - logic
good devops engineer that can do 2 things:
- dev - ops
[+] [-] gleenn|4 years ago|reply