The workplace policy has been in effect for many years, and was until recently an advertised perk of working for Slack. It allowed all employees access to free paid time off from 24th until the New Year (some employees like incident responders would take shifts, but even Customer Experience (their support team) ran skeleton shifts). Today they have announced this policy has ended as a result of the economy as well as making the workplace more equitable (as Salesforce employees could not access this benefit).
[+] [-] kabdib|3 years ago|reply
I was was part of a startup that a number of Apple engineers went to; over half of our engineering org was from Apple, and were used to having that time off, our management chain was fine with it, and we just took it as part of our startup's culture.
The New CEO, a real sales guy, had different ideas. "I think that people can be really productive during that week." He was adamant that he wanted to see butts in seats, across the company. Engineers? Not special. (We were working until the early hours of the morning, nearly every day).
We were told by our director not to worry about it, and just not show up if we didn't want to. What was he going to do, fire half of his engineers?
Some people just don't get it.
[+] [-] kenward|3 years ago|reply
I didn't appreciate this skill until I had a manager who did the same for me. Having a manager who can ruthlessly prioritize, set expectations, and help navigate all of the corporate bureaucracy is a godsend.
[+] [-] NonNefarious|3 years ago|reply
After several years of this happening, I decided to book plane tickets to see my family before the prices got astronomical. Sure enough... that was the one year we didn't get it off.
I went anyway.
[+] [-] jmspring|3 years ago|reply
This was HIGHLY team dependent. I know people that were still busting ass 12+ hour days around the holidays due to deadlines/etc.
[+] [-] bombcar|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mmcnl|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] prirun|3 years ago|reply
He might see my butt in a seat that week, but he damn sure wouldn't see me working past 5, and I'd be looking for a new job.
[+] [-] raxxorraxor|3 years ago|reply
There are some really special people with horizons till their office wall. Of course this is a huge benefit but it is also where it starts. Benefits like this allow for crunch time in times of need. If there is a constant time of need there is no need for extra work.
[+] [-] joshstrange|3 years ago|reply
It's too bad their hands were entirely tied on this and they had no other choice but to take it away from everyone. /s
It always amazes me when my coworkers pretend things just "are how they are" within a company. Everything can be changed, everything is negotiable, nothing is set in stone. Obviously this gets harder as the company gets bigger but the defeatist attitude I often see is so depressing. I'm sure there were some people (Salesforce employees) who heralded this a good change instead of thinking for even 1 minute about how the better change would be that everyone got it. And don't tell me they couldn't afford it, that's just bullshit.
[+] [-] harry8|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] irrational|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] joshmanders|3 years ago|reply
My company gave us more holidays off, decided to add extra days off before and after holidays that typically land on weekends, unlimited PTO and a policy of encouraging you to take time off not shame you for using 1 day for a doctors appointment, and surprisingly unlike literally everywhere else I worked, they gave me an 8% raise to account for inflation.
[+] [-] ilikehurdles|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Gunnerhead|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kybishop|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] idkman123|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sp332|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dboreham|3 years ago|reply
*French fries.
[+] [-] civilized|3 years ago|reply
Right, right. Slack just won't make it unless everyone works through the holidays.
I don't know about you all, but to me it's obvious that C-levels use moody economic periods as an excuse to do all the Scroogey things they would actually be more than happy to do in any economic season.
It would make just as much sense, if not more, to drastically cut their outlandish "performance" pay when the economy is down, but I don't think we'll be seeing much of that.
[+] [-] RpFLCL|3 years ago|reply
> I read on a post somewhere that if you replace "the economy" with "rich people yatch money" a lot of headlines make more sense.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25507123
[+] [-] adamparsons|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] darth_avocado|3 years ago|reply
Firing people and making the others work twice as much? It's the economy. Take free soda from the kitchen that costs cents? It's the economy. Remove 4 days of holidays that would otherwise improve morale and productivity? It's the economy. Make employees waste hours in commute everyday? We obviously need to do it because it's the economy.
[+] [-] stevage|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jdwithit|3 years ago|reply
I mean no offense to any posters from those locales. You are a human, I respect you and your skills, most of you are probably better at tech than I am. I am glad you have jobs.
The point is the company said "OH NO, THE ECONOMY, WE HAVE TO DOWNSIZE, CANNOT AFFORD THIS HEADCOUNT" out of one side of its mouth. While backfilling those vacated spots as fast as it could from lower cost regions. It was a cowardly, calculated move that they had been praying for an excuse to execute.
[+] [-] shostack|3 years ago|reply
And then they wonder why people leave once conditions permit.
In some ways it's almost like the economic change is _welcomed_ because it puts downward pressure on comp (for companies that can weather the storm at least).
[+] [-] benatkin|3 years ago|reply
Those aren't the biggest holidays for everyone, and it isn't even the new year for everyone
[+] [-] jmspring|3 years ago|reply
Acquisitions (depending on how they are handle) go through a period of autonomy and then absorption. Saw this when I was with MSFT and Skype.
Honestly this post sounds a bit whiny and lacking reality in how acquisitions go about.
[+] [-] paulgb|3 years ago|reply
I think you’re reading more into the post than is actually there. It’s three sentences written in a pretty matter-of-fact voice, giving context on the old policy and management’s messaging on the new one. As someone following the labor side of the tech industry, I found it to be an interesting data point.
[+] [-] RSHEPP|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] procinct|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] all_factz|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eloisius|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] generalpf|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Griffinsauce|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|3 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] altdataseller|3 years ago|reply
Salesforce raised the prices for Slack Pro Plan as well recently. Doesn't sound like something you'd do if the economy is that bad...
And i assume Salesforce revenue is going to decline this year since the economy is that bad, huh?
[+] [-] cebert|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cdf|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bb611|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nathantotten|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zdragnar|3 years ago|reply
It really depends on your customer's needs; slack going down for a day or two over the holidays is unfortunate but not the end of the world. Salesforce going down could, I imagine, easily cause massive financial losses.
I'd like to think it should be easy enough to put people on emergency call rather than forcing them to put 8 hours of butts in seats for no reason, but apparently that's not how Salesforce wants to roll.
[+] [-] jimmytucson|3 years ago|reply
As for holiday shutdowns, I think these actually benefit the company more than the employee. If you give people a week off they were most likely going to take some or all of anyway, they tend to accept less floating PTO and then it just nets out to coordinated PTO. This prevents clever folks from taking those 5-7 days during peak periods and working the relaxed time when so many people are out of office you can’t really deliver on anything significant anyway.
[+] [-] hackitup7|3 years ago|reply
"making the workplace more equitable (as Salesforce employees could not access this benefit)"
If you're a long-time Salesforce employee, you watch a bunch of people from Slack walk through the door with tons of cash from their acquisition _and_ they get additional holidays that you don't. I'm not saying that this is some crazy injustice (life isn't fair), but I could see it logically putting a lot of pressure on the morale of other Salesforce teams.
[+] [-] chaboud|3 years ago|reply
Naturally, people complained, and the HR person speaking, at that point a bit flustered, yelled "look, the good news is that this is saving [the company] a lot of money!"
It didn't help, but it was the truth. They were doing it because they could and because the decision-makers didn't care that they were effectively giving everyone massive pay cut. They'd weighed the downsides and done the math. The real impacts are hard to quantify, though, as the employees that leave will be the ones who can, leaving the company biasing towards employees unable to leave. It's how companies slowly bleed out.
[+] [-] carabiner|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ipaddr|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] musesum|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] idkman123|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jollybean|3 years ago|reply
Nothing happens between XMass and New Years, the 'double holiday' + 'holiday season' means people are distracted.
The rule should be: work on what you want to but nothing is expected.
I would definitely 'get a few things done' during that time, but otherwise, not let it interfere with doing stuff, or 'nothing' after the tiring holidays.
It's a real benefit for everyone in the company to be 'down' at the same time. It's a better holiday knowing nobody is going to bother you for anything.
[+] [-] sdf4j|3 years ago|reply