Ask HN: How do you find the weird parts of the web?
372 points| bittercynic | 3 years ago | reply
subgenius.com timecube.2enp.com
Things on the fringes of sanity, or sometimes far over the line.
Any resources for finding material that is way out there, but manages to steer clear of hateful/racist/bigoted patterns of thought?
[+] [-] manuelmoreale|3 years ago|reply
- are.na seems to attract people who have odd interests and it’s full of quirky websites
- webrings are still a thing and there’s a bunch out there worth checking out
- directories like https://512kb.club/ are usually full of interesting sites
- by following links on blogs and sites you find interesting
- some cool forums are still out there (https://forum.agoraroad.com/index.php)
Shameless plug but I am currently curating https://theforest.link precisely because of the issue you’re describing.
[+] [-] P5fRxh5kUvp2th|3 years ago|reply
I knew a few were still around, but I'm not aware of any that are actively maintained.
I'm aware sci-fi is technically fantasy, but that categorization has never sat well with me.
[+] [-] bch|3 years ago|reply
Oh wow. As an in-my-head joke, after I read the HN title, “web rings” was my answer to myself, casting my mind back to 1995… Imagine my delight to hear it’s still not only an answer, but a good one.
I don’t even know how much longer after Alta Vista vs Google “The Web” was interesting. My flip knee jerk assumption is Google optimized it all into the intellectual equivalent of the worst of children’s breakfast cereals. These days it’s HN and it’s community that serve as big role as jump-off point to interesting things.
[+] [-] arbirk|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pdinny|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] status200|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Kovah|3 years ago|reply
- https://cloudhiker.net/
- https://jumpstick.app/
- https://theuselessweb.com/
- https://www.viralwalk.com/
- https://www.boredbutton.com/
- https://urlroulette.net/
- https://links.yesterweb.org/
- https://wiby.org/
- http://theoldnet.com/
- https://www.darkroastedblend.com/
- https://randomwebsite.mickschroeder.com/
- https://theforest.link/
- https://geocities.restorativland.org/
- https://usefulinterweb.com/
[+] [-] narrator|3 years ago|reply
For example, try "solar warden" (not the video game or the novel which is what the mainstream sites want to tell you about) on Yandex if you want to go down a fun rabbit hole.
[+] [-] uejfiweun|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] beermonster|3 years ago|reply
I stopped using Google years ago as I find their search results, aside from being plagued by ads and people trying to game the results, have just become less useful. Which mainstream search engines are you referring to (I think DDG use bing).
[1] https://duckduckgo.com/q=solar+warden
[+] [-] yaddaor|3 years ago|reply
And providing rt.com's propaganda as #2 on "Ukraine invasion"? Totally not suspicious.
OP asked for "manages to steer clear of hateful/racist/bigoted patterns of thought" though.
[+] [-] braingenious|3 years ago|reply
It wasn’t particularly fun but it was genuinely an odd thing to come across on today’s internet.
[+] [-] yreg|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tonto|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 1970-01-01|3 years ago|reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StumbleUpon
[+] [-] tsol|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hag|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] themodelplumber|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] betwixthewires|3 years ago|reply
There's also places on the web that are not right off the highway so to speak, you can find them by delving into smaller communities like forums, fediverse is a good place to find stuff like that. weboasis.app has links to a ton of small back road link aggregators and forums. The real internet exists, it's just google and Facebook aren't going to show it to you.
[+] [-] wan_ala|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] matheusmoreira|3 years ago|reply
If you want to widen the spectrum of humanity that you're exposed to, you're inevitably going to come across these people. Personally I thought it was well worth it. Plenty of good and bad to be found.
[+] [-] cptcobalt|3 years ago|reply
I'm totally ok with sites on the internet that require you to have a bit of thick skin or being mildly uncomfortable with some ideas, since there's a spectrum that goes both ways, somewhat conceptually related to the Overton window, moral relativism, etc: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window
Things you disagree with will always exist, and it's occasionally worth reading to sharpen and inform your own opinions—you don't need to adopt the perspective or arguments of viewpoints you disagree with, etc. Personally, I think it adds flavor to thinking, as a willful rejection of hegemonic thought practices. Occasionally, on an empathetic reading, you grow to understand that people who have opinions who make you uncomfortable at face-value sometimes have good intent behind it, and in a critical lens you realize they may just be misguided in how to resolve a problem they see. (Certainly not in all cases, but we're humans—it's good to not reduce differing perspectives to one-dimensional readings.)
But what should not exist is content like (for lack of better examples) Kiwifarms, where bad actors used the relative anonymity of the internet plus crowd psychology to radicalize folks in their in-circle and cause extreme, mortal harm to others. That's not the good weird web.
[+] [-] akudha|3 years ago|reply
There is a treasure trove of amazing stuff on Reddit, Twitter etc. But finding that stuff is getting harder and harder. There is much more money in promoting hate, bigotry etc than positive, interesting stuff.
[+] [-] Cthulhu_|3 years ago|reply
I believe there's a big percentage of people who hadn't yet had their moment of self-actualisation or whatever the phrase is, who listened to the right(wrong) people at the right(wrong) time and ended up believing the earth is flat or the holocaust never happened.
[+] [-] crazytalk|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rpigab|3 years ago|reply
"The searchmysite.net search engine is a niche search, focussing on the "indieweb" or "small web" or "digital gardens", i.e. non-commercial content, primarily personal and independent websites."
https://searchmysite.net/
[+] [-] SllX|3 years ago|reply
Here’s one I found recently: http://www.betainfoguide.net/
The social tech of 2007 in the web tech of 1997 for the tape tech of 1977. I swear if browsers still supported the blink and marquee tags there would be some of that on display here.
[+] [-] zephyrfalcon|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ZeWaren|3 years ago|reply
https://observablehq.com/@stared/tree-of-reddit-sex-life
[+] [-] Apreche|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hectorlorenzo|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] baristavibes|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] krapp|3 years ago|reply
I suspect the bias is wanted, consciously or not. Part of the nostalgia for the 'old web', which this specific thread is a subset of, is for a return to the sense of homogeneity and community from when the web was primarily the playground of white male adolescent nerds, a culture with common referents and ideals. It's a kind of "white flight" from the modern web in that sense.
[+] [-] spangry|3 years ago|reply
Why is this? (genuinely asking)
[+] [-] unknown|3 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] really_relay|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] anigbrowl|3 years ago|reply
For that matter, even superficially toxic online spaces are often highly contested and exhibit recognizable dynamic patterns, notwithstanding the anonymity of the participants.
Alternatively, anything is possible at zombo.com.
[+] [-] Theodores|3 years ago|reply
The interest does not have to be that weird. Along the way you might contact someone that has the same interest as yourself, for example to ask if they have an image in a different format or at a higher resolution. With a bit of rapport and infectious enthusiasm for their subject, I am sure you can get more into it with sources for the original content shared.
History is a good way to get on this journey. I am fascinated by what people ate in times past, and on a quest to find an answer to whom man's best friend really was. The sheep is the front runner on that, not the dog. There is no absolute answer, nobody has put me on a deadline to come up with a definitive answer, it is just pure, self-directed study for the joy of learning.
I like things that are outside of Google search results. I also view Google search results as a facsimile for a full web search. With your phone there is that feature to identify songs with Google Assistant. Even if you are not online it will get results for most songs. It has a cache of what it thinks is enough for most people. I think Google search results as a whole are like that.
[+] [-] anothernewdude|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] arboles|3 years ago|reply
(a big list of them) https://seirdy.one/posts/2021/03/10/search-engines-with-own-...
[+] [-] rapjr9|3 years ago|reply
http://www.theoddityarchive.com/ "psychotronic" http://sainteuphoria.com/
[+] [-] Stamp01|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jimjimjim|3 years ago|reply