I set out to tackle this problem a few years ago and while it was easy to rig up stuff to do this in Linux, getting anywhere near the rendering quality that I saw in OS X was impossible. It seems it may still be :-)
It was a couple of years ago now and I asked on Twitter if anyone would pay for an OS X powered Web page screenshot service and had a lot of response but.. busy with other things. Would love to see one though as it seems to be the only OS to render pages with any finesse.
That would be another cool feature for this - to pick your browser/OS to point out browser specifics bugs. There's already http://netrenderer.com/ for IE - but it doesn't let you do anything with the image.
That's obviously a very limited focus for a great general use app, but an idea.
In the hopes of finding out the rendering engine Snapito used, I tried http://snapito.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwhatsmyuseragent.com%2F ; however, that seems to hang forever. I would chalk that up to heavy load from HN, except that other pages seem to work just fine.
:-) I use wkhtmltoimage but I’m considering a move over to PhantomJS it’s a known bug that if a page contains a missing resource which 404s then the whole thing 404s. Hence why I’m considering PhantomJS as it’s at least a lot easy to program error detection etc.
I typed in "example.org", and got back "Please enter a URL". For convenience, consider automatically assuming "http:// in the front if the user doesn't specify a URL scheme. (Please do continue allowing URLs with http:// or https:// explicitly specified, though.) You shouldn't make that assumption if you provide an API in the future (API callers should specify full valid URLs), but it would make the current web interface more friendly.
Whatever renderer you used to render the page has absolutely no antialiasing in its font rendering, resulting in pixelated rendering.
Josh that’s really interesting, what browser were you using, because the app doesn’t say ‘Please enter a URL’ this must be a browser feature working against input type=‘url’. I’d love to know the browser you were using. It certainly shouldn’t require a http:// at the front.
Yeah you’re 100% right about the fonts, I definitely plan to sort that out ASAP.
I like it. It's neat and fun to play with, but I'm not exactly sure what to do with it. I think a little "What you can use Snapito for" or "10 ways to use Snapito" link somewhere would be helpful. I can imagine it being useful for web designers who want to show designs to people, but how else do you envision people using it?
Also (this is just a minor nitpick), it'd be nice to not have to enter in http://. I'm using Chrome.
It would be 100x more useful if you added a set of tools at the right that emulate Skitch, so you could mark up a screenshot and then merge the edits into a new image. I would probably stop using Skitch immediately.
Also - if you're going to use KISSinsights to ask your users questions, ask a meaningful question. The current question is pretty obnoxious. Just my $.02
Interesting that you'd switch from Skitch if it had that feature set. I can't imagine a scenario where I'd ever prefer to hit, from a page I'd like a screenshot of:
> cmd+l, cmd+c, cmd+t, sna, <down-arrow>, enter, tab, cmd+v, enter, right click generated image, copy link
As opposed to (skitch keybinds):
> cmd+shift+5, click once in my browser window, click once on share link
Out of curiosity, what is it that makes the web-based workflow more appealing to you as a user?
Javascript is on but this is running on headless Linux without TTF so there’s the rub, clearly the fonts are a big issue so I’m thinking about the whole elegant rendering aspect actually. I think the comments about rendering on OS X actually have some merit if the cost can be kept down.
This is a cool hack! I think the next step is to think about what kind of problem this technology could solve. For example, I would use this tool if I could input a width and height to dynamically generate snapshots of websites at different screen resolutions.
So this came about because people keep asking me for what tool to use to full page snapshots. And while there are tools that do it on your local machine, most web tools are just focussed on integrating with other sites not the user experience. So I thought I’d give it a quick go - I’ll probably add the scaling stuff at some point, just want to keep it nice and easy for users at the mo.
One minor critique... the example placeholders are of the form "example.com" but it seems to reject domains that are not fully qualified (e.g. "http://example.com)
Thx. Really, without the http:// - darn - do you have an example, that would be awesome if you did. I just tried a few and they seem to work. But clearly there’s a bug somewhere so I’d love to squash it!
Is this a toy project or are you guys planning to develop it further? There is a couple of really neat opportunities to turn this sort of service into a good business.
It’s a test of the water in regards to a more user focussed website snapshotting service. Rather than the usual aimed at integrating into third parties. In reality it was put together in a couple of hours as a POC - underneath the covers it uses the code from main project http://boardcast.it which is still pretty experimental.
Love to hear of any ideas/suggestions you have, feel free to drop me a line neil AT snapito.com if you like too. I’m all ears.
[+] [-] petercooper|14 years ago|reply
I set out to tackle this problem a few years ago and while it was easy to rig up stuff to do this in Linux, getting anywhere near the rendering quality that I saw in OS X was impossible. It seems it may still be :-)
It was a couple of years ago now and I asked on Twitter if anyone would pay for an OS X powered Web page screenshot service and had a lot of response but.. busy with other things. Would love to see one though as it seems to be the only OS to render pages with any finesse.
[+] [-] dmils4|14 years ago|reply
That would be another cool feature for this - to pick your browser/OS to point out browser specifics bugs. There's already http://netrenderer.com/ for IE - but it doesn't let you do anything with the image.
That's obviously a very limited focus for a great general use app, but an idea.
[+] [-] hashbo|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JoshTriplett|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sjs382|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gbaygon|14 years ago|reply
http://snapito.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwhatsmyua.com%2F&x=...
Seems to be using webkit.
[+] [-] hashbo|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cypherpunks01|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JoshTriplett|14 years ago|reply
Whatever renderer you used to render the page has absolutely no antialiasing in its font rendering, resulting in pixelated rendering.
[+] [-] hashbo|14 years ago|reply
Yeah you’re 100% right about the fonts, I definitely plan to sort that out ASAP.
[+] [-] thealoof|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thealoof|14 years ago|reply
Also (this is just a minor nitpick), it'd be nice to not have to enter in http://. I'm using Chrome.
[+] [-] dmils4|14 years ago|reply
It would be 100x more useful if you added a set of tools at the right that emulate Skitch, so you could mark up a screenshot and then merge the edits into a new image. I would probably stop using Skitch immediately.
Also - if you're going to use KISSinsights to ask your users questions, ask a meaningful question. The current question is pretty obnoxious. Just my $.02
[+] [-] fourk|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hashbo|14 years ago|reply
Interesting idea RE: skitch, certainly worth some consideration - I had considered annotations at least, and will take the idea very seriously.
RE: KISSinsights, I’m a bit of an amateur really so I just used the recommended free questions to get started with. But point taken :-)
[+] [-] sycr|14 years ago|reply
11. Full-page screenshot service that doesn't suck
I'm happy to be able to tick it off as completed by someone else. :)
Edit: I tried sending it a url with Typekit fonts on the page. No dice. I'm assuming that Javascript is turned off?
[+] [-] hashbo|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] andygcook|14 years ago|reply
I'm sure quite a few web developers, especially startup founders, wish they did a better job keeping track of iterations and design changes.
[+] [-] hashbo|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tumblestrap|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hashbo|14 years ago|reply
So this came about because people keep asking me for what tool to use to full page snapshots. And while there are tools that do it on your local machine, most web tools are just focussed on integrating with other sites not the user experience. So I thought I’d give it a quick go - I’ll probably add the scaling stuff at some point, just want to keep it nice and easy for users at the mo.
Thanks for the feedback!
[+] [-] wilzy|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hashbo|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] trun|14 years ago|reply
Neat idea though.
[+] [-] hashbo|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] abcd_f|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hashbo|14 years ago|reply
Love to hear of any ideas/suggestions you have, feel free to drop me a line neil AT snapito.com if you like too. I’m all ears.
[+] [-] edwardy20|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hashbo|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hv23|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jusob|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] url2png|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] aith|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hashbo|14 years ago|reply
Or in fact the website has some missing artefacts which confuse Snapito! Consider that bug firmly raised.
[+] [-] glomph|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]