Our trashy domain killed our reach – don't make the same mistake
We've built a edtech platform to help students consume study material more efficiently, by leveraging AI to create and review (human-like) quizzes, flashcards, summaries and a chat room where you can talk to the uploaded documents.
Initially we were gaslighted by the r/domains to always use the .com domain even if it doesn't sound very catchy, so we went with myathenaai.com (athena.com is $2mil).
After the change to athena.study, daily unique visitors sky-rocketed up by 500%, conversion rate from visitors to registered users went up by 5%. We got lots of feedback that our first domain sounded scammy, even though it's a .com one.
TLDR: trash domain = -90% of your product value (at least in our case / B2C / no-marketing)
[+] [-] talldayo|1 year ago|reply
You should be careful making broad conclusions about things that might not be causally related. The startup scene has a habit of using anecdotal experience as hard evidence of some big takeaway that's often not even true. I won't claim to know the situation any better than you do, but if you were a late-stage startup I would give you the same advice r/domains did.
[+] [-] brka|1 year ago|reply
Thanks for the input - we're a bootstrapped very early stage startup so we do not have the option to go with an expensive .com domain - the .study is the one that made most sense as we are an education platform
[+] [-] xivi0n|1 year ago|reply
We've performed some initial testing and captured the users feedback on both domains. After we switched the domain, without any other feature changes we've observed the website analytics and these are the reported numbers.
Even other popular options like .co, .net, .ai and so on are over tens of thousands of US dollars, so we had two options, either to change the name or to go with the .study TLD.
[+] [-] dankwizard|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] lamp_book|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] wruza|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] yarrowy|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] xivi0n|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] rendx|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] brka|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] h2odragon|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] xivi0n|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] hboon|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] wruza|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] xivi0n|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] ipaddr|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] xivi0n|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] nhggfu|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] xivi0n|1 year ago|reply