I'm getting annoyed with the changes in the iOS App Store so I just finished porting several apps to Android and now I'm working on Windows 8. Just wondering if anyone has any experience good or bad with the new Windows platform.
I have a couple of applications exclusively marketed for WP7 and Windows 8. The biggest benefit I have seen is that the lack of apps in both markets makes a it prime ground for building a brand. It is still sparse enough to where you don't even need an original idea, just fill in an obvious gap. At the same time it is a gamble whether or not it will pick up, but I think both platforms have much promise. It is also good to note that Pubcenter (Microsoft's ad platform) beats most everything else out there, as in >.60 eCPM averages. A buddy of mine did a Pandora client for WP7 is reporting ad revenue of > $100 a day. I'm personally hitting somewhere around $30 a day. It's definitely harder to hit numbers like that in competing marketplaces. I imagine that if they pick up my buddy and I will be in a nice position which is what developing for an upcoming platform is really all about.
If all apps are considered equal, you may be less likely to make $100/day on iOS. But you can be sure that the upper limit of what you can make is many times greater on the App Store than on the Windows Store.
I have a few free Windows Phone 7 apps in the marketplace. Since Windows Phone 8 shipped I've seen my download rate increase ~50%, and it seems like around 30% of my active users are running WP8. I'm not making any money with these (just fun projects for me), but its a datapoint FWIW
The whole Windows ecosystem is a huge mess for developers right now.
Visual Studio 2012 often crashes, the API documentation is often incomplete and not helpful, there are quite a number of incompatibilities between W8 and WP8, XAML has mediocre performance on ARM and can't be accessed from C++ on WP8, the list goes on and on.
If anything, Microsoft managed to make most Windows developers I know want to work on linux/Android or OSX/iOS instead - the rest are blissfully unaware of what UNIX is in the first place.
Sure these things may improve over time, but right now developers are nothing more than beta testers. For us, the possible profits are not worth the efforts to deal with the mediocre development experience.
The Windows Phone sales of our app have been extremely lackluster. Our app is a paid app priced at $4.99 and targeted for Windows Phone 7.
On iOS we regularly get into the Top 10 iPhone and iPad Sports apps (both top paid and top grossing), and on Android into the Top 20 Sports apps on Google Play.
Our WP7 version has generated approximately 0.5% of what our iOS app has made, or approximately 2% of our Android app.
We also have had a Mac version of our app available since July which has almost passed the total sales of the WP version which has been on the market for over a year (our app is primarily targeted at mobile device users while they're at a sporting event, so lower computer sales are expected).
The jury is still out on how our Windows 8/RT app will sell in relation to the others since it was released just prior to the launch of Win8 but after the majority of our sport's season had completed for the year.
Our app does spread pretty virally at the events. In our completely unscientific polling of users, most of them found out about the app from other users, and I would guess that those WP users probably just assume that it's not available to them (we do give it equal promotion with the rest of the versions on our website).
As far as the release of WP8 goes, we haven't seen any noticeable uptick in sales as a result.
Yeah same here. Numbers from Microsoft keep saying it's better, but only with relative numbers. Sure app sales have doubled in a month, but if it's from 10-20 I'm not that excited.
That's why I started this thread though. See if any indies have something out yet and are making actual money comparable to either iPhone or Android.
As a dev, I don't access to a reasonably priced WP8 device being sold in my country, and after getting the Lumia 800 a yaer back, if I have to get another phone, the more pertinent question would be how much money I am spending to develop these apps.
Contact your local Windows Phone champ if you have one. (Attend a .Net user group and ask around) I have received 4 devices free as a result of partnering with my regional resource.
My experience with WP development. I have a Twitter client (I know, it's not an original app, it started just as a playground) since February, and I can tell some things:
- A lot of people answering questions (even if WP itself doesn't have a big developer community, lots of questions are common to Silverlight, C# and .NET platform ones so you have plenty of resources). The documentation is really good, at least comparing with what I've seen on Android and iOS (Android was far worse when I looked into it).
- VS2012 is also pretty good. Of course, you don't get as deep as you would with a plain C compiler, but that's another point. I've heard that it really becomes great when you use all MS tools like TFS for version control and collaboration. With git... well, there are plugins but I think it's better to use the console. Same with unit tests. There is a library for unit testing on Windows Phone and it's good enough, but I expected something more from MS.
- The store is a 5/10. It's good enough, but it can improve a lot. Luckily, they're very open to new ideas and are improving each month.
- Making money: My app is free, made 3000 downloads last month. Not a bad number taking into account that it's difficult to compete with well established apps like Mehdoh, Rowi, Gleek and Peregrine and I don't get so much exposure. But I'm pretty sure that this number could be far higher: on average, I got ~50 downloads per day, but the app was highlighted three days in the spanish Store, about 1200 downloads more.
So, with a bigger user base and more exposure in the store (localization helps a lot, for me it almost tripled downloads of the app) you can make money. Of couse, if nobody downloads your app, you won't make any... But there's less competing apps here, so it's easier to get to the top of the market. You won't get as many benefits as if you were on Android / iOS, but probably there you wouldn't be on the top.
As a Windows Phone user, one thing I can comment on is that some Windows Phone apps that I have seen in my personal experience are more expensive than Android or iOS apps. I'm assuming this is because developing for WP has a lower potential for return, but it really turns me off on the app. Some I've been willing to purchase on my Android tablet, I have not purchased on my Windows Phone because the price difference was 99c vs 2.99.
Price is something you have to take into account; price it too high and people won't buy it, which in turn gives you a lower ROI. Then you have developers complaining that their WP app didn't turn a profit and the market is dead when in reality the price was just out of sync with other platforms. Consumer's aren't blind, and regardless of the platform they don't care the reason why your prices are high. All they care about is iOS gets it for 99c and they're saddled with a price significantly higher than that.
While I can understand what you are saying in theory, 1.99 or 2.99 is not in fact significantly higher. it's a dollar. 1/4 a cup of coffee. I know we've had these discussions before and it's not coffee blah blah blah. But come on, "significantly higher." It's just not.
The thing is, apps are priced as they are because of risk. In general, apps are worth either 0 or significantly higher than a dollar. If it turns out you don't like it and you don't use it, then it's worth absolutely nothing. On the other hand, if you like it and end up using it all the time, it's worth far far more than $1.
If you already know you like an app because you've used it on another platform, or tried a trial or demo version, spending 1.99 or 2.99 really shouldn't be much of a hurdle.
Also, I suspect those devs started out at the same price point, and when they sold 1-5% of what they do on iOS or Android they decided to raise the price.
I know someone that quit his job because he was making enough money on advertising alone on just Windows Phone 8 apps. He's got even more apps in the store now, so I don't know how much he's making but I think he's doing very well. Then there's Windows 8 which promises to be much bigger!
As far as I know you shouldn't even be making WP8 apps, because they are not compatible with any WP7 device. So developers are stuck with building WP7 apps that also work on WP8 devices, because most WP devices are WP7.
And I don't think a Windows 8 app can be the same as a WP8 app either. At the very least you'll need a whole new UI and design, and most likely quite different code, too. It's not as easy as Microsoft says: "write once, publish to all our platforms with Windows in their name".
As a Windows 8 developer, the most frustrating part of WP8 is the lack of compatibility for native HTML5/WinJS apps. For me, this was the best thing about Windows 8. It made building apps easy and fun. The most ridiculous thing about the whole thing is that the HTML5/WinJS apps are completely responsive, and you pretty much have to build a mobile version of your app to support "snap" mode. So, they could easily have a write once, run anywhere model if they just supported native HTML5 apps in WP8. Sorry, /rant.
Not true. Windows 8 runs WPF which is what also runs the UI of WP7/8. The code layer is/can all be C# as well. That means that the compatibility is actually must farther than that of Java/Android/Linux. Not being able to run Android Views on a Linux box being the differentiating factor.
The local university here in Finland has in interesting partnership with Microsoft. They offer you some money if you develop your app exclusively for Windows Phone for the first 6 months or so. Seems quite harmful for the startups...
I won't even think of building for Windows phone until I see them in the wild. I did see one at the cable car turn around in San Francisco - so I asked the guy using it... Yup, he worked for MSFT
I have an iOS/Android app side project that I'm interested in porting to Windows Phone 8/7. I have never worked in the microsoft eco system. I have 2 questions.
What would be a good test device? No contract, not too expensive but also a viable device.
Anywhere or anyone recommended to do the development?
[+] [-] toolboc|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] clarky07|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jcromartie|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jedi3335|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jtheory|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jeremiep|13 years ago|reply
Visual Studio 2012 often crashes, the API documentation is often incomplete and not helpful, there are quite a number of incompatibilities between W8 and WP8, XAML has mediocre performance on ARM and can't be accessed from C++ on WP8, the list goes on and on.
If anything, Microsoft managed to make most Windows developers I know want to work on linux/Android or OSX/iOS instead - the rest are blissfully unaware of what UNIX is in the first place.
Sure these things may improve over time, but right now developers are nothing more than beta testers. For us, the possible profits are not worth the efforts to deal with the mediocre development experience.
[+] [-] jcromartie|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] meaty|13 years ago|reply
We've bailed and moving to java on the server and web and android apps for mobile.
[+] [-] marklubi|13 years ago|reply
On iOS we regularly get into the Top 10 iPhone and iPad Sports apps (both top paid and top grossing), and on Android into the Top 20 Sports apps on Google Play.
Our WP7 version has generated approximately 0.5% of what our iOS app has made, or approximately 2% of our Android app.
We also have had a Mac version of our app available since July which has almost passed the total sales of the WP version which has been on the market for over a year (our app is primarily targeted at mobile device users while they're at a sporting event, so lower computer sales are expected).
The jury is still out on how our Windows 8/RT app will sell in relation to the others since it was released just prior to the launch of Win8 but after the majority of our sport's season had completed for the year.
Our app does spread pretty virally at the events. In our completely unscientific polling of users, most of them found out about the app from other users, and I would guess that those WP users probably just assume that it's not available to them (we do give it equal promotion with the rest of the versions on our website).
As far as the release of WP8 goes, we haven't seen any noticeable uptick in sales as a result.
[+] [-] codefoster|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rjsamson|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] clarky07|13 years ago|reply
That's why I started this thread though. See if any indies have something out yet and are making actual money comparable to either iPhone or Android.
[+] [-] manojlds|13 years ago|reply
BTW, the emulator is horrible.
[+] [-] CodeCube|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sandyarmstrong|13 years ago|reply
I'm running Windows in a VM on OS X 10.8 so I wonder what you could be doing to make the WP8 emulator suck.
[+] [-] toolboc|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] spqr|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] sriramk|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jtheory|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gjulianm|13 years ago|reply
- A lot of people answering questions (even if WP itself doesn't have a big developer community, lots of questions are common to Silverlight, C# and .NET platform ones so you have plenty of resources). The documentation is really good, at least comparing with what I've seen on Android and iOS (Android was far worse when I looked into it).
- VS2012 is also pretty good. Of course, you don't get as deep as you would with a plain C compiler, but that's another point. I've heard that it really becomes great when you use all MS tools like TFS for version control and collaboration. With git... well, there are plugins but I think it's better to use the console. Same with unit tests. There is a library for unit testing on Windows Phone and it's good enough, but I expected something more from MS.
- The store is a 5/10. It's good enough, but it can improve a lot. Luckily, they're very open to new ideas and are improving each month.
- Making money: My app is free, made 3000 downloads last month. Not a bad number taking into account that it's difficult to compete with well established apps like Mehdoh, Rowi, Gleek and Peregrine and I don't get so much exposure. But I'm pretty sure that this number could be far higher: on average, I got ~50 downloads per day, but the app was highlighted three days in the spanish Store, about 1200 downloads more.
So, with a bigger user base and more exposure in the store (localization helps a lot, for me it almost tripled downloads of the app) you can make money. Of couse, if nobody downloads your app, you won't make any... But there's less competing apps here, so it's easier to get to the top of the market. You won't get as many benefits as if you were on Android / iOS, but probably there you wouldn't be on the top.
[+] [-] freehunter|13 years ago|reply
Price is something you have to take into account; price it too high and people won't buy it, which in turn gives you a lower ROI. Then you have developers complaining that their WP app didn't turn a profit and the market is dead when in reality the price was just out of sync with other platforms. Consumer's aren't blind, and regardless of the platform they don't care the reason why your prices are high. All they care about is iOS gets it for 99c and they're saddled with a price significantly higher than that.
[+] [-] clarky07|13 years ago|reply
The thing is, apps are priced as they are because of risk. In general, apps are worth either 0 or significantly higher than a dollar. If it turns out you don't like it and you don't use it, then it's worth absolutely nothing. On the other hand, if you like it and end up using it all the time, it's worth far far more than $1.
If you already know you like an app because you've used it on another platform, or tried a trial or demo version, spending 1.99 or 2.99 really shouldn't be much of a hurdle.
Also, I suspect those devs started out at the same price point, and when they sold 1-5% of what they do on iOS or Android they decided to raise the price.
[+] [-] codefoster|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jheriko|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mtgx|13 years ago|reply
And I don't think a Windows 8 app can be the same as a WP8 app either. At the very least you'll need a whole new UI and design, and most likely quite different code, too. It's not as easy as Microsoft says: "write once, publish to all our platforms with Windows in their name".
[+] [-] madoublet|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] spoiledtechie|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yread|13 years ago|reply
TLDR; minor code changes, change screen ratio, add screenshots
[+] [-] rewriteme|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mutru|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] brezina|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] TouchMint|13 years ago|reply
There are a few things I still need to figure out before going over there tho.
Where to get a free/cheap device? I keep hearing people saying they got free testing devices
What lang I need to write in for it to work on win7phone, win8phone and win8rt/win8
[+] [-] toolboc|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dazzla|13 years ago|reply
What would be a good test device? No contract, not too expensive but also a viable device.
Anywhere or anyone recommended to do the development?
[+] [-] sequence7|13 years ago|reply
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/reviews/mobile-phone/3415168/noki...
[+] [-] meaty|13 years ago|reply
Never test on a flagship device!
[+] [-] anonymous1983|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]