Imagine you receive an envelope with 3 checks and a letter that says that you must invest all the money and try to get as much return as you can. The first check is 1k, the second 2 and the last of 5k (US$). The only thing is each investment need to be independent from each other.
[+] [-] subrat_rout|13 years ago|reply
1. Try to invest in something you know inside out. In that way you increase odd of return.
2. What about your risk profile and current financial situation? If you have any credit card debt with 16% interest then you better pay off that. Very few investment in US will have annual return 16% or more.
3. If you are a risk averse person then you can invest the money into a index fund.
4. Or you can invest that money in yourself by learning something (a new skill, language or tool) you think it will propel your career forward.
[+] [-] fusiongyro|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Schwolop|13 years ago|reply
The timescale of the investment should definitely change the priorities.
[+] [-] moocow01|13 years ago|reply
Its also difficult because firstly you have to look at all the possible investment opportunities and understand if your larger pools of 5k and potentially 2k buy you into any better opportunities. In other words you have to justify why you used the 5k for an investment instead of the 2k - without knowing specifics about the person its quite difficult.
With such a small amount of money comparatively to other investors in most environments Id say the person would be best off "investing in themselves" - apply all 3 buckets to learning 3 different potentially marketable skills that they hopefully can eventually leverage to create larger investment buckets. If the amounts were larger I might answer differently but with those amounts your best market is yourself.
[+] [-] JoachimSchipper|13 years ago|reply
Assuming you have no debt (or only ridiculously cheap debt), invest in yourself or save it for a rainy day; the latter allows you to not borrow for or insure small consumer stuff like computers or washing machines, which will be far more lucrative than "investing".
[+] [-] nicholas73|13 years ago|reply
In some ways this is really the order of things in life. The investments that take the least money require the most work and time. The investments that take the most money are fast but involve more risk.
I tried my hand at each but I can't say one is better than the other for making money.
[+] [-] meric|13 years ago|reply
If you invest in stocks, do it so that you won't need to buy/sell for many years. (Save for exceptions during macroeconomic tail events)
[+] [-] enigmabomb|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] andymoe|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] niico|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] joncooper|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] atsaloli|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mapster|13 years ago|reply