How can we get Google Support?
That happened a few weeks ago and thanks to some inside people at Google, the mailing-list reappeared. As the admin of the list, I received no email about the closing of the mailing-list, no explanations, and not even an email when the mailing-list reopened after a few days of black-out.
I was not happy with this situation but I thought it was just a glitch. But then, some days ago, they did it again. The mailing-list is not accessible anymore, not even by me (the admin).
There is no way to get support, no way to get in touch with someone at Google. This is really frustrating. Of course, this is a free service and Google can do whatever they want, but I would at least expect a way to get some kind of support (hell, I'm even ready to pay fot it)... or at least, some kind of email (even an automatic one) telling me what we did wrong (and I doubt that we did anything wrong as the mailing-list is moderated and we are only talking about yet another PHP framework).
HELP! How can I get in touch with someone at Google? How can we get by our mailing-list?
[+] [-] edent|13 years ago|reply
It boils down to the fact that even if every customer needed 1 minute of support every 2 years that would mean they'd have to employ 6 trillion people (or some rubbish).
As I said earlier this year, Google have total contempt for their customers - yes, even their paying customers. http://shkspr.mobi/blog/2013/02/googles-customer-contempt-co...
Self host. Don't rely on Google. Sadly, that's the only way to do it.
[+] [-] yaix|13 years ago|reply
This was the thread on Webmasterword, when Google closed Million USD Adwords advertiser accounts without warning, after changing their guidelines unannounced http://www.webmasterworld.com/google_adwords/4020049.htm
Google is completely automated, and individual customers don't exist, only statistically significant numbers.
> Self host. Don't rely on Google.
Or any other company if you don't have a contract that legally protects your data while it is on another company's server.
[+] [-] runjake|13 years ago|reply
We are not Google's customers, we are Google's product. Google is an advertising business and we are the eyeballs it seeks. Android is merely meant as a pathway for those eyeballs. Same with Gmail, Youtube, etc.
Google giving us support is akin to a beef farm offering massages and a counseling hotline to their cattle.
[+] [-] albertzeyer|13 years ago|reply
And Google could setup the fee for the support in such way that it is financially self-hosting.
[+] [-] mangoman|13 years ago|reply
I think Google devotes proportional resource to the products which give them value, and I think that's probably why Groups is being negelected. It is unfortunate for Groups users, but Google does have to make money.
[+] [-] ihuman|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mayukh|13 years ago|reply
Setup a separate Customer Support organization for specific services. Staff with lower-skilled folks from cheaper locations (since cost seems to be such a huge concern). So a $X yearly plan entitles you to Y number of queries and gets you a response from customer support in N days.
For example a $20,000 per year engineer (very reasonable in lower cost locations) would require 2000 users paying 10 per year to breakeven.
The question is why would google even bother ?
[+] [-] mark_l_watson|13 years ago|reply
I prefer being a paying customer. If I should ever have a problem with Dropbox or Evernote I bet I get good support. And, I have my data backed up locally.
[+] [-] wolfgke|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] OGinparadise|13 years ago|reply
When they get some real competition they will be nicer to their users and consumers. If you want to advertise online in any meaningful way, you cannot ignore Google. They know that so they act as a monopolistic tyrant (also see At&T, Verizon, banks etc)
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] swombat|13 years ago|reply
The support experience was outstanding. There was a smart, informed person handling the case. It was a tricky case, there were a number of emails exchanged and several lengthy phone calls, and it turned out not to be Google's fault at all (it was Rackspace's fault), and yet they were courteous, helpful, intelligent, informed, hands on.
One of the best support experiences I've had - but it only happened after we started paying for our email accounts.
[+] [-] JPKab|13 years ago|reply
I get so tired of people who get "free" (yes, i know Google monetizes their use with ads) stuff wanting support. If you want support, you have to pay for it. The skilled person wearing the headset in the call center doesn't work for free.
[+] [-] jaredmcateer|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jay_kyburz|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] onemorepassword|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Serow225|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zalew|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] alternize|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] scardine|13 years ago|reply
Recently we had a problem concerning the Gmail IMAP API and the X-GM_RAW extension.
- https://developers.google.com/google-apps/gmail/imap_extensi...
Quoting from the docs: "Arguments passed along with the X-GM-RAW attribute when executing the SEARCH or UID SEARCH commands will be interpreted in the same manner as in the Gmail web interface"
But this is not true. For example, the in:anywhere filter will not work in the same manner as in the Gmail web interface. In fact, it is ignored. We opened a support ticket at the "enterprise support" portal (https://enterprise.google.com/supportcenter/), and after 2 weeks dealing with some entity that could very well be a chat bot, no solution.
By trial and error we discovered that in order to get the same result as "in:anywhere" you have to issue an IMAP select to the folder "[Gmail]/All Mail" - which has a different name depending on the user Gmail language settings - for example, its "[Gmail]/Todos" in Spanish (you have to list all folders and look for a folder with the "\All" flag).
The document is still incorrect today. Having a billion users is not an excuse for crappy support. Seems like the whole experience is designed to be opaque and frustrating, to make you feel like you were the character of "The Trial" from Kafka.
[+] [-] atirip|13 years ago|reply
I seriously wonder how long such a begging - please Google, good Google - will finally end.
[+] [-] zoul|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ximeng|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rplnt|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ChuckMcM|13 years ago|reply
Short answer: In order to get in touch with someone to talk to at Google, first talk to a sales rep for Google Apps and buy the product, ask the Sales rep to put you in touch with your assigned support engineer. Your costs are going to go up quite a bit.
Longer answer: These services aren't "free", they cost money and resources to run. Everyone knows this of course but for some reason it sort of doesn't sink in. You have exactly two choices here, one you can use someone else's "free" service and periodically get bitten in the balls when it either fails, decides to shut down, or randomly disables your access. Or you can build your own version of the service for your organization where you end up spending someone on your staff's "free" time to maintain it and some of your excess budget to "host" it. The good news is that nearly all the groups that might currently be doing this can get away with a single "business" class IP service with 1 dedicated IP address. So figure $60 - $100 a month depending on your location.
Seriously, that is it. Those are your choices. So suggestions:
1) First exfitrate all your meta data you currently use for Google Groups. Which is to say download all the email addresses and membership lists.
2) Second start looking around for an alternative solution (check in your organization perhaps someone already has a machine "hosted" somewhere they can donate to your cause)
3) Third, I really would talk to the sales guy (or gal) at Google to get pricing and while you are at it you can mention your having troubles and they may be able to contact someone inside who will help you out.
[+] [-] mablae|13 years ago|reply
GoogleReader is best example, Google has actually become evil.
@fabpot Did you take a look at Discourse?
[+] [-] ry0ohki|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] k3n|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] almost|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] reustle|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] BenoitEssiambre|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hamax|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ixacto|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jpalomaki|13 years ago|reply
I see also positive side in Google not catering all possible needs. This leaves space for smaller companies to cover these needs and make some money while doing it.
[+] [-] mablae|13 years ago|reply
[1]: https://twitter.com/ianbarber/status/321942852823289856
[+] [-] lylejohnson|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mablae|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] songgao|13 years ago|reply
If you are gonna close a user's account, either by human or by a robot, you should notify the user before you do it, so that the user can fix the violation if there's any, or find/migrate to an alternative.
Mailing-lists might not be the worst. I mean if you have a backup list including every members email address, you can email them about switching to an alternative. But imagine your Google Apps free account is closed without any prior notification. You suddenly cannot use your email. You decide that you can't have your email address dead knowing that emails sent to it just sink, so you sign up another custom-domain email provider (or build your own on ec2), and tweak with the configurations, which takes an hour. Then you go to your DNS provider and update MX records. Oops, DNS updates can take several hours even one day to synchronize. That's up to a day that you are worrying about missing important emails.
And it did happen before: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4825445
[+] [-] lnanek2|13 years ago|reply
Google is not providing support to save costs. If Google implemented warning emails and some sort of compliance check or communication to indicate issues have been addressed, that would add costs as well.
[+] [-] anuraj|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Kiro|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] btipling|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fedir|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jpswade|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MichaelApproved|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sgdesign|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ceautery|13 years ago|reply
(Yes, I realize Symfony is a software framework, but my hypothetical bot may be using name-matching alone.)
[+] [-] mndrix|13 years ago|reply
Hire as many support staff per product as Google deems profitable. When submitting a support request, I indicate how much I'm willing to pay to receive an answer. The highest bids get answers, the rest don't (or get slower answers depending on request volume and difficulty).