Ask HN: Hitting a wall with Twitter
21 points| mittermayr | 11 years ago | reply
It's constantly breaking down due to Twitter's strict REST API limits (something everyone knows and has to work around with), but I receive e-mails from people daily willing to pay more, and more, and more if I can find a way to keep the service up and running.
As of now, it's all coming down to site-streams, which is only enabled to whitelisted accounts. They would solve all the problems, I could make the service real-time and make a lot of money before all those guys decide to go with Adobe or Sprinkler, the big terrible ugly things. This is my biggest shot taking off and I feel like the window is about to close very shortly.
I do not sit in San Francisco, I have been unable to meet Twitter folks in person outside of SF so far. It seems a lot of the partnerships are built locally, in SF, through networks, which makes a lot of sense, but completely shuts it down for us.
I've been trying to reach out through every possible venue, partner programs, beta programs, mailing lists, been an active and helping member on the API forums and have hit the wall now, not knowing what to do next.
I have the technology and technical intelligence, the infrastructure, I have lots of paying customers, I haven't even started marketing the software yet (word of mouth), and all I fail at is getting permission to proceed professionally from Twitter.
Anyone, please, any ideas? This is a last resort call.
[+] [-] stevejalim|11 years ago|reply
Have you
a) done everything listed at https://dev.twitter.com/docs/streaming-apis/streams/site#App... ?
b) considered getting on a plane to SF, spending a few weeks there, and network like hell, in an attempt to meet face-to-face with someone at Twitter? You said you're desperate, so all options are on the table, though I suspect I'll get shot down for suggesting this.
[+] [-] mittermayr|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hcho|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mittermayr|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] AznHisoka|11 years ago|reply
One immediate thought: Your prices are ridicuously too low. By like a magnitude. Of like 10 times. $25/year? Heck, $25/month would be too cheap. Increase your prices, and your problem is solved because you'll have fewer accounts to get all the data you need.
[+] [-] mittermayr|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mittermayr|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] applecore|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mittermayr|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ekanes|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jvvlimme|11 years ago|reply
It would mean rewriting your service but it would offer long term viability.
[+] [-] mittermayr|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stevejalim|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mittermayr|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] strick|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mittermayr|11 years ago|reply