Ask HN: how to work faster when building a product?
7 points| notastartup | 11 years ago
Even stuff that I thought was completely built and satisfied with ends up changing as I change other bits of the equation.
The most frustrating part is when I can't figure out the wording on a website, or playing with icons that ends up eating up a lot of time (but I gotta have it perfect)
Is this normal or are some people just able to do one thing once, and move on and never come back to it?
[+] [-] martinnormark|11 years ago|reply
Perfection is the enemy of execution.
Honestly, how proud would perfect icons make you if your product didn't resonate with anyone, and you didn't get any customers within the first month? 2 months? 3 months?
Remember that you can improve week after week after week, once you've launched and you get feedback that indicates what customers want. Then you can improve the right things, which is very important.
[+] [-] stevekemp|11 years ago|reply
So now I've "relaunched" with a basic bootstrap theme. The praise and feedback has been universal. And yet I personally think I now have a site which looks exactly like every other ..
In conclusion my recent experience tells me that users want both functionality and prettiness - and so in the future I know I'll be in the same situation and I will spend hours and hours and hours juggling where I lay my text, and what theme to choose.
[+] [-] wldcordeiro|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ankit84|11 years ago|reply
I have spent plenty of hours to improve that last mile of 10%. Later realized shipping first 80/90% and then fix 10% based on feedback.
[+] [-] dukekarthik|11 years ago|reply
One suggestion that I can give is to give undivided focus to any particular task (say icons) and not worry about time until you get it right. Mind you, you may revisit and change it again.
In case of a doubt, push it to A/B testing.
So, keep calm and carry on :)
[+] [-] josephschmoe|11 years ago|reply
Try the following:
1. Define a set of tasks well enough that someone else could do them without asking many questions.
2. Then, execute a single task without changing it, even if you change your mind midway through.
A "task" is equivalent to an hour or two of work.
When it's all done, do this process again for new features/changes.
This is good for the following reasons:
1. Separate out the thinking/analysis phase and the coding phase. This forces you to think things through before implementing them.
2. Modifying something is usually easier once it's already done. Also, you'll likely make few or no redundant modifications.
3. It makes you more aware of the time cost activities have, since you're splitting them up into several hour chunks instead of hundreds of unorganized several minute actions. You can better manage and prioritize 1-5 tasks rather than "whatever comes up".
This is very similar to Scrum, but for an individual developer.
[+] [-] notastartup|11 years ago|reply
This is what happens: Fix bug. Something I am lacking understanding of. Ask Stackoverflow, wait for answer, question gets closed for being vague. Go to IRC, ask around, no one is answering. Rage hard. Look at bug again, very small detail I overlooked.
Whenever I get to a time sink bug, I find it completely drains me of my energy. I have a hard time moving on to the next bug because I am very bothered by leaving a loose end.
[+] [-] vitalyny|11 years ago|reply
Plan features for the next 1-2 weeks and complete them. Then plan for the next 1-2 weeks etc.
Only do things that are important and should be done immediately, ignore all the rest (like important, but can wait; etc).
[+] [-] YousefED|11 years ago|reply
Tip on writing website copy: take your laptop to a different location than where you work (I find a new environment helps creativity for writing), read a few blogs on how to write website copy, and then just finish v1 of the text. Helped me a lot.
[+] [-] bogomil|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tkinom|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] josephschmoe|11 years ago|reply