LeoDox | 9 years ago | on: Confronting the Credibility Gap for Crewed Exploration of Mars
LeoDox's comments
LeoDox | 9 years ago | on: Pregnancy alters woman's brain 'for at least two years'
LeoDox | 9 years ago | on: Leonardo Da Vinci’s To Do List (circa 1490)
Having said that, learning has ALWAYS involved a lot of solitude and independent research - it's just that "levelling up" used to REQUIRE asking other people for advice, input and tips, whereas with the Internet it's practically expected for people to never ask for help.
Basically, back in the old days, a novice asking "explain this to me" was met with "ah! a fellow academic! how rare! OK here's how it is" whereas today it's met with "google exists for a reason".
Humans beings are motivated by social stimuli
LeoDox | 9 years ago | on: Want to know how to build a compiler?
I have three questions:
1. Is it merely a question of mass? That is, if Mars were larger would the increased gravity increase pressure at the core and keep it molten?
2. If it IS merely a question of mass, is there any way to add mass to Mars which doesn't disturb its orbit? Because if you could, then you simultaneously solve both the problem of low gravity AND lack of magnetosphere, which together solve the problem of maintaining atmosphere. Basically the whole planet becomes extremely Earth-like
3. If increased mass wouldn't necessarily wreck its orbit, could something be done to "steer" asteroids from the Main Belt into collision courses with Mars?
I really don't know anything about orbital mechanics so maybe there's an obvious flaw in this (aside from the energy required to reroute that many asteroids).