abbracadabbra | 3 months ago | on: Super-Emitter of the Most Damaging Greenhouse Gas Found in Germany
abbracadabbra's comments
abbracadabbra | 8 months ago | on: Tesla Robotaxi Freaks Out and Drives into Oncoming Traffic on First Day
abbracadabbra | 3 years ago | on: Trump’s Major Announcement Is $99 Digital Trading Cards
abbracadabbra | 3 years ago | on: Revealed: FTX’s emergency fundraising term sheet
abbracadabbra | 5 years ago | on: Supermicro Hack: China Exploited a US Tech Supplier over Years [2021 follow-up]
abbracadabbra | 5 years ago | on: I am an Uighur who faced China’s concentration camps
abbracadabbra | 5 years ago | on: Tell HN: YouTube fixed the dot after domain ad bypass
abbracadabbra | 5 years ago | on: Six eBay executives and employees charged over alleged cyberstalking campaign
> Those involved became so concerned that they developed a list of people in California they could frame if authorities tracked the harassment there, Lelling said
abbracadabbra | 5 years ago | on: Dark Basin: Uncovering a Hack-for-Hire Operation
abbracadabbra | 5 years ago | on: Three authors retract study on hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine
One of these "studies" is a 2-page Google Doc with no real data. Another is the discredited Raoult study, which is under investigation by the journal [1]. Another study cited is also by Raoult's team. The Brazil study (ref. 29) doesn't seem to have passed peer review (yet?) and has severe methodological flaws. Like the Raoult studies, the Brazil study was not randomized, but makes no attempt to control for confounding by indication or self-selection, such as with propensity score matching or similar methods commonly used in observational studies. The last study cited isn't a study, but an article from a local news station.
abbracadabbra | 5 years ago | on: Three authors retract study on hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine
One of these "studies" is a 2-page Google Doc with no real data. Another is the discredited Raoult study, which is under investigation by the journal [1]. Another study cited is also by Raoult's team. The Brazil study (ref. 29) doesn't seem to have passed peer review (yet?) and has severe methodological flaws. Like the Raoult studies, the Brazil study was not randomized, but makes no attempt to control for confounding by indication or self-selection, such as with propensity score matching or similar methods commonly used in observational studies. The last study cited isn't a study, but an article from a local news station.
abbracadabbra | 5 years ago | on: Three authors retract study on hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine
One of these "studies" is a 2-page Google Doc with no real data. Another is the discredited Raoult study, which is under investigation by the journal [1]. Another study cited is also by Raoult's team. The Brazil study (ref. 29) doesn't seem to have passed peer review (yet?) and has severe methodological flaws. Like the Raoult studies, the Brazil study was not randomized, but makes no attempt to control for confounding by indication or self-selection, such as with propensity score matching or similar methods commonly used in observational studies. The last study cited isn't a study, but an article from a local news station.
abbracadabbra | 5 years ago | on: Three authors retract study on hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine
One of these "studies" is a 2-page Google Doc with no real data. Another is the discredited Raoult study, which is under investigation by the journal [1]. Another study cited is also by Raoult's team. The Brazil study (ref. 29) doesn't seem to have passed peer review (yet?) and has severe methodological flaws. Like the Raoult studies, the Brazil study was not randomized, but makes no attempt to control for confounding by indication or self-selection, such as with propensity score matching or similar methods commonly used in observational studies. The last study cited isn't a study, but an article from a local news station.
abbracadabbra | 5 years ago | on: Widely disseminated hydroxychlroquine study retracted by authors
One of these "studies" is a 2-page Google Doc with no real data. Another is the discredited Raoult study, which is under investigation by the journal [1]. Another study cited is also by Raoult's team. The Brazil study (ref. 29) doesn't seem to have passed peer review (yet?) and has severe methodological flaws. Like the Raoult studies, the Brazil study was not randomized, but makes no attempt to control for confounding by indication or self-selection, such as with propensity score matching or similar methods commonly used in observational studies. The last study cited isn't a study, but an article from a local news station.
abbracadabbra | 5 years ago | on: Widely disseminated hydroxychlroquine study retracted by authors
One of these "studies" is a 2-page Google Doc with no real data. Another is the discredited Raoult study, which is under investigation by the journal [1]. Another study cited is also by Raoult's team. The Brazil study (ref. 29) doesn't seem to have passed peer review (yet?) and has severe methodological flaws. Like the Raoult studies, the Brazil study was not randomized, but makes no attempt to control for confounding by indication or self-selection, such as with propensity score matching or similar methods commonly used in observational studies. The last study cited isn't a study, but an article from a local news station.
abbracadabbra | 6 years ago | on: E Ink smart screen puts a newspaper on your wall
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2020/04/10/nytfrontpage/scan...
abbracadabbra | 6 years ago | on: Venezuelan naval boat rams passenger cruise liner, damages itself, sinks
abbracadabbra | 6 years ago | on: Chrome deploys deep-linking in latest build despite privacy concerns
abbracadabbra | 6 years ago | on: Institutional investors have subscribed for 6.3B shares for Aramco IPO
abbracadabbra | 6 years ago | on: Leaked Files Expose How China Organized Mass Detentions of Muslims