codesections | 2 months ago | on: Kidnapped by Deutsche Bahn
codesections's comments
codesections | 1 year ago | on: Can LLMs write better code if you keep asking them to “write better code”?
I hadn't seen this before. Why is asking for planning better than asking it to think step by step?
codesections | 1 year ago | on: You Don’t Know Jack about Bandwidth
codesections | 1 year ago | on: You Don’t Know Jack about Bandwidth
codesections | 1 year ago | on: International Reply Coupon
“ In 1920, Charles Ponzi made use of the idea that profit could be made by taking advantage of the differing postal rates in different countries to buy IRCs cheaply in one country and exchange them for stamps of a higher value in another country. His attempts to raise money for this venture became instead the fraudulent Ponzi scheme.[24] In practice, the overhead on buying and selling large numbers of the very low-value IRCs precluded any profitability. The selling price and exchange value in stamps in each country have been adjusted to some extent to remove some of the potential for profit, but ongoing fluctuations in currency value and exchange rates make it impossible to achieve this completely, as long as stamps represent a specific currency value, instead of acting as vouchers granting specific postal services, devoid of currency nomination.[25]”
codesections | 2 years ago | on: Lenovo's Project Crystal is first laptop with a transparent MicroLED display
codesections | 2 years ago | on: Scientists discover underlying cause of "brain fog" linked with Long Covid
I suggest editing the headline to reflect this - maybe "Scientists claim to have discovered underlying cause of Long Covid linked 'brain fog'"
codesections | 3 years ago | on: Ask HN: How does Hacker News avoid (successful) DDoS attacks?
Interesting. The API README states:
> There is currently no rate limit.
I guess that's wrong/out of date. I wonder when that changed?
codesections | 3 years ago | on: Ask HN: How does Hacker News avoid (successful) DDoS attacks?
codesections | 3 years ago | on: Overlapping markup
codesections | 3 years ago | on: Ask HN: Technical forums that are not dominated by pedantry?
In my experience, everything you said is 100% true -- once groups get big enough. But each of those points is, equally, 100% false for small groups.
For example, the Raku community is fairly small, so the r/rakulang subreddit is friendly. For that matter, even the [raku] StackOverflow tag is friendly! Last I checked, the same was true of the corresponding Rust tags, though I know they've grown a lot since I was a regular there.
codesections | 3 years ago | on: Elon’s Out
I'm open to that criticism; I'm typically pretty skeptical of appeals to authority myself.
But to be clear: the appeal to authority I'm making isn't "legal opinion of a lawyer" (I agree that's very weak) but rather "opinion on corporate law by a Wachtell attorney who practiced corporate law" (Wachtell is probably the best corporate law firm in the world, and clearly in the top handful)
codesections | 3 years ago | on: Elon’s Out
If your interpretation of the post suggests that a highly qualified attorney is getting the basics of US law absurdly incorrect, you might want to reconsider whether you're understanding the intended meaning.
(Here, Levine is making a specific claim about the remedies that the Delaware chancellory court typically employs, not about the authority of US courts)
codesections | 3 years ago | on: Detecting unauthorized physical access with beans, lentils and colored rice (2021)
Just spitballing, but you could do it with a "once only" system if you could generate it reliabilly/deterministically enough that you don't need to measure it post-generation
codesections | 3 years ago | on: The Victim Cloud: Gullibility in the golden age of scams
I disagree, for two reasons. First, an outside-view argument: lawyers who currently practice in that field apparently disagree:
> Deborah reached out to more than thirty attorneys. Only one called her back. Deborah’s eldest brother consulted another, who called her situation “a terminal case.” “There’s no life here,” he said. Her claim was dying, if not already dead.
Second, on the merits: most of the fraud protections have requirements that the defrauded customer notify the bank promptly (either after the fraudulent transfer or after the next bank statement). See, e.g. [0]. It looks like that didn't happen here.
[0] https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/100...
codesections | 3 years ago | on: Don't just shorten your URL, make it suspicious and frightening (2010)
codesections | 3 years ago | on: Git.io deprecation: Active links to be maintained in a read-only state
codesections | 3 years ago | on: Git.io deprecation: Active links to be maintained in a read-only state
(Plus they're expressly intended to last "forever" and are maintained by one of the few organizations with the multi-century history to credibly make that claim (Havard Law School))
codesections | 3 years ago | on: Show HN: Favicons for HN
codesections | 4 years ago | on: Ask HN: Software That Insults You?
"Can't open X display. It *is* running, yeah?"
That's not quite an insult, but seems to be the in the same spirit
It’s much worse than that – FedEx would never treat cargo like that. If they took cargo further away from its destination than it started and then left it there for the customer to sort out, that would break so many SLAs …