justjonathan | 8 months ago | on: Tom Lehrer has died
justjonathan's comments
justjonathan | 11 months ago | on: Thieves took their iPhones. Apple won't give their digital lives back
justjonathan | 1 year ago | on: Defcon stiffs badge HW vendor, drags FW author offstage during talk
justjonathan | 2 years ago | on: The IRS unit taking on America's millionaires and billionaires
There are less than 1000 billionaires in the US.
Just because these words rhyme doesn’t mean they are remotely similar.
justjonathan | 2 years ago | on: Ukraine intelligence 'confirms' Russian forces using Starlink
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/01/...
justjonathan | 2 years ago | on: Gummy Bear says Christmas is not about surveillance
justjonathan | 2 years ago | on: Mystery math whiz and novelist advance permutation problem
justjonathan | 2 years ago | on: Show HN: I built an on-device LLM based chatbot for iPhones
justjonathan | 2 years ago | on: American children are drowning in self-esteem (2016)
justjonathan | 3 years ago | on: Roald Dahl ebooks remotely updated to censored versions after purchase
justjonathan | 3 years ago | on: NLRB bans non-disparagement and confidentiality mandates in severance agreements
A few thoughts and takeaways.
1.) This case only applies to employees that the NLRA covers. In other words, it does not apply to anyone classified as a "supervisor" under Section 2(11) the Act. For these employees, keep your severance agreements as-is; this case does not impact them at all.
2.) McLaren Macomb is prospective only. It will have no impact on severance agreements previously signed.
3.) This decision makes very little sense. By the very nature of a severance agreement, you are giving a former employee something to which they are not entitled (additional money) in exchange for a signed agreement that contains certain covenants. The ex-employee is free to take the severance payment in exchange for the signed agreement (including the confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses) or not take the severance payment (and say whatever they want to whom). As these non-disparagement and confidentiality clauses are a condition of the receipt of a severance payment to which a non-employee is not otherwise entitled, I fail to see how the NLRA is implicated at all.
justjonathan | 3 years ago | on: Storing OpenAI embeddings in Postgres with pgvector
justjonathan | 3 years ago | on: Apple unveils suite of AI-voiced audiobooks
justjonathan | 3 years ago | on: Apple unveils suite of AI-voiced audiobooks
justjonathan | 3 years ago | on: Almost all searches on my independent search engine are now from SEO spam bots
Some feedback: some initial searches did not find blogs that were of interest. When browsing I noticed the tags. I wish there was a page of tags that I could browse. If there is, I could not find it.
Also many of the site titles do not provide useful information on their topics and are untagged. If you could auto generate some tags, perhaps based on word frequency in post titles (with some stopwords no doubt), that would improve the browsing experience, at least for me.
justjonathan | 4 years ago | on: Resources for Learning Computational Complexity Theory
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF0b3ThojznRKYcrw8moY...
justjonathan | 5 years ago | on: A virtual Apple Macintosh with System 8, running in Electron
justjonathan | 5 years ago | on: Semantic Satiation
justjonathan | 5 years ago | on: Semantic Satiation
justjonathan | 5 years ago | on: More blockchain sandwich attacks and victim becomes predator
Some choice excerpts:
"a bot paid a hefty 68 ETH fee to the miner in order to buy 100 ETH worth of KTN before anyone can..."
"The catch is ... there is a line in the code that says that liquidity snipers can't dump their tokens..."
"The @kattanatrade team even published the source code, with the "LiquidityTrap" feature, which prevents sniper from dumping their token."