nixarian's comments

nixarian | 6 years ago | on: Truth: A Love Story

Paternity testing should be mandatory at the birth of the child. Adultery is socially destabilizing, and should be discouraged.

nixarian | 6 years ago | on: Microbots Are on Their Way

Or maybe we could inject them into the brain, and then could 'override basic autonomic function. Maybe we could use this on a recently dead body and it could do simple things, like amble around, maybe grab things, or bite.

nixarian | 6 years ago | on: Academe’s Extinction Event: Failure, Whiskey, and Professional Collapse at MLA

"We have rhapsodized demolition as liberation" Sounds like a conservative criticism of the Enlightenment.

"There was this sense that we were being broken down and built up again as new people, as these high-powered minds — only without the groupthink that gets enforced in a barracks." Is he sure about that? It seems certain ideas are enforced with cult-like rigidity.

My experience heading toward the academic track, and then ducking out, wasn't a great one. I felt like I learned more on my own, out of my own interest in the subject, than in any classroom. It gave me a few starting points, but that's all. Academia seems to have ceased to be a place where people engage in and built upon the Western cultural project, and instead is a place of 'liberation' from that project, from the west, from the canon, from everything that put a foundation under our civilization, letting in everything that doesn't matter. In a sense, it deserves to die. And it deserve to die even more for not seeming to recognize why it's dying, and for placing all the blame on others. And yet, cultural studies, humanities, and history, are all absolutely necessary for democracy, and if it truly ends, what then?

If I'm allowed to be rude, another problem is a serious lack of thoughtful people, even this guy doesn't seem to be saying anything interesting or provoking, yet he thinks he's worthy of a position. I really noticed a lack of any kind of academic debate going on in my time at university. I felt alone in my desire to test and challenge ideas. One female student in an English class once attacked me for 'wanting to argue with ideas all the time'. What should I make of that?

I'll end with a provoking thought, the kind of thing that should be allowed in academe: so men together, in the good old boys club, built things, and women and men together produced what? too many heirs? :^)

nixarian | 7 years ago | on: The good old days? In many ways, yes

Exactly. More people entering the labor force was only good for the owners and employers, it destroy the bargaining power of the actual workers. Add to that the fact that having two parents at work seriously harms the family, making it more difficult for their children to develop in healthy ways. This is the future we asked for. Given the statistics that say women only want to marry men who make more money than them, it seems to have done even more harm than we might imagine, because there are few women wanting men to stay home and fill the role certain ideologues claimed would be open to them.

nixarian | 7 years ago | on: Aether – Free, privacy-sensitive public communities

You state that one of the purposes of this platform is to allow you the freedom to be wrong, but if people can save something before 6 months, how would you prevent someone from saving an embarrassing comment for future use against you? Or are you the only one capable of saving your own comments?

nixarian | 7 years ago | on: Aether – Free, privacy-sensitive public communities

But that's exactly what you're doing. You're oppressing them by denying them the ability to speak because you believe (perhaps rightly) that their opinion and way of living is wrong. Would you actually not deny housing to a nazi? Openly fascist people ARE denied jobs, how can you imagine otherwise? "Closet" facists are allowed to have jobs, in the same way closet homosexuals were allowed to have jobs back when homosexuality was considered toxic.

nixarian | 7 years ago | on: Aether – Free, privacy-sensitive public communities

"awful people" As in, people who are inherently awful, cannot be helped, and should therefore be cut out of society. Why stop there? Why not put them in prisons? Fine with that? Why stop there? Why waste resources on trash? Why not incinerate them in some kind of large cooking appliance? :^)

nixarian | 7 years ago | on: Potato paradox

All you're saying is that any Muslim picked up is more likely to not be a criminal, which seems expected. The problem with "strong sampling", is, perhaps obviously, that they focus too strongly on the 'brown skinned people' and therefore might miss other criminals. The article you link seems to suggest some profiling is good, but that strong profiling AND random sampling are equally inefficient.

"A mathematically optimal strategy would be 'square-root biased sampling,' the geometric mean between strong profiling and uniform sampling, with secondary screenings distributed broadly, although not uniformly, over the population."

page 1