noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: BGP on Windows Desktop
noyoudumbdolt's comments
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: Money creation in the modern economy (2014) [pdf]
It’s truly absurd to argue that banks have no incentive to limit lending to make sure they get paid back. The 2008 crisis proves no such thing. Banks simply made a lot of bad bets.
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: Stripe clawed back pension contributions after staff cuts
Sounds like you’d be disrespecting Austrians, and Austrian and German diaspora all over the world by u/michpoch’s logic.
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: Money creation in the modern economy (2014) [pdf]
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: Ask HN: We found a cracked version of our software on the web, now what?
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: Zeno’s paradox
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: Windows OS Security
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: Windows OS Security
The Trojan writer now targets systems with UAC, since it’s the default and the vast majority of systems, so you’re not gaining anything. And he never needed an elevated token in the first place.
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: ChatGPT Can't Kill Anything Worth Preserving
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: Windows OS Security
This obsession with not running as root/using UAC is just cargo cult security for single user systems.
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: Windows OS Security
But whether you have an elevated token or not won’t make a difference in almost all cases.
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: Windows OS Security
Protecting local administrator tokens is also kind of a useless security feature these days. What are you worried about? Data theft? Ransomware? Trojans? Credentials theft? All of those can be done just fine with only standard user permissions, without an administrator token. OTOH, you need an elevated token to install device drivers or whatever.
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: I measured the pollution from my gas stove
What is the downside to this? Obviously availability and ease of filling is part of it, but any other downsides?
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: The organ as a wind instrument
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: Microsoft's response to liberating the ending to Minecraft
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: C Posix-compliant argument parsing in 42 LoC, inspired by Duff's device
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: C Posix-compliant argument parsing in 42 LoC, inspired by Duff's device
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: U.S. moves to seize $460M Robinhood stake linked to Sam Bankman-Fried
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: U.S. moves to seize $460M Robinhood stake linked to Sam Bankman-Fried
Wrong, wrong, wrong. Even putting the specifics here aside, that's not how civil asset forfeiture works. If the government seizes your assets, you can force them to go to court, where they have to establish to a preponderance of the evidence that the seized property was the proceeds of illegal activity. That's the same standard that anyone seeking to sue you and take your money has to meet.
noyoudumbdolt | 3 years ago | on: U.S. moves to seize $460M Robinhood stake linked to Sam Bankman-Fried