outrun86 | 2 months ago | on: HP Reveals Keyboard Computer with Ryzen AI Chip
outrun86's comments
outrun86 | 1 year ago | on: 62% of Canadians Plan to Avoid the U.S. for at Least the Next Year
outrun86 | 1 year ago | on: 62% of Canadians Plan to Avoid the U.S. for at Least the Next Year
If the claim is that Trump is simply throwing trade with Canada for no reason whatsoever, i.e. he’s simply an unhinged madman, that’s certainly a politically popular narrative. I’ve provided pointers to reasonable evidence for pressuring a neighbouring state to get its security issues under control, and based on years of hearing about that stuff it seems rational to me. You’re free to disagree, friend.
outrun86 | 1 year ago | on: 62% of Canadians Plan to Avoid the U.S. for at Least the Next Year
outrun86 | 1 year ago | on: 62% of Canadians Plan to Avoid the U.S. for at Least the Next Year
https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/03/fact-sheet-pr...
outrun86 | 1 year ago | on: 62% of Canadians Plan to Avoid the U.S. for at Least the Next Year
The US security establishment is aware of this, as is the Canadian security establishment. The 1% fentanyl headline is indeed widely reported, it’s also a red herring. The simple answer is Canada doesn’t really look, so not much is seen. More info here, by one of Canada’s best investigative journalists:
https://www.thebureau.news/p/trade-based-money-laundering-is...
IMO Trump is, as the official white house press release says, trying to put pressure on Canada to address this. Are tariffs the best way to do that? A valid question, for sure. Does he have other, possibly irrational, motivations? Also an excellent question.
But I see much Canadian and US commentary that assumes there is nothing rational about this at all, and that there is no Canadian border/security issues, and I would say that’s incorrect.
outrun86 | 1 year ago | on: Intel admits AI deceases productivity (Misreported!)
Here is the actual study, which says the opposite:
https://download.intel.com/newsroom/2024/client-computing/ai...
outrun86 | 1 year ago | on: Scientific American's departing editor and the politicization of science
outrun86 | 1 year ago | on: I Stayed
outrun86 | 2 years ago | on: Behind the scenes: the struggle for each paper (2021)
outrun86 | 2 years ago | on: Porsche Design System v3
outrun86 | 2 years ago | on: Mathematical Introduction to Deep Learning: Methods, Implementations, and Theory
I’m glad you’re enjoying the book. The approach is ideal for a very small subset of the ML population, no doubt that was their intention. I’m just weighing in that it’s entirely possible to cover this material with rigour yet much simpler notation. Even as someone who could parse this I’d go with other options.
outrun86 | 2 years ago | on: Mathematical Introduction to Deep Learning: Methods, Implementations, and Theory
outrun86 | 2 years ago | on: Spain tech job market is facing a hiring freeze
outrun86 | 2 years ago | on: Pythagorean Theorem found on clay tablet 1k years older than Pythagoras (2009)
outrun86 | 2 years ago | on: Every single Onewheel is being recalled after four deaths
outrun86 | 2 years ago | on: Ask HN: How do you look for jobs in 2023?
outrun86 | 4 years ago | on: Unprecedented Heat Wave in Pacific Northwest Driven by Climate Change