pebb | 13 years ago | on: Wikipedia doesn't need your money
pebb's comments
pebb | 13 years ago | on: The FreeBSD Foundation falls short of its 2012 fundraising goal by 50%
pebb | 13 years ago | on: Apple will invest $100 million to bring Mac production back to the US next year
pebb | 13 years ago | on: Intel Raises $6 Billion in Bond Sale to Buy Back Stock
pebb | 13 years ago | on: YC W13 Will Be Smaller
pebb | 13 years ago | on: Telomerase – Mouse lifespan extended up to 24% with single treatment (May 2012)
pebb | 13 years ago | on: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills
pebb | 13 years ago | on: Print me a jet engine
pebb | 13 years ago | on: Dotcom: "We've hit the jackpot"
pebb | 13 years ago | on: On Being Not Dead
Checkout lef.org
pebb | 13 years ago | on: On Being Not Dead
But then, most people live crap lives.
pebb | 13 years ago | on: Yang Jisheng: The man who discovered 36 million dead
pebb | 13 years ago | on: The last day
pebb | 13 years ago | on: A Better Twitter Bootstrap Modal
pebb | 13 years ago | on: How I went from $100-an-hour programming to $X0,000-a-week consulting
pebb | 13 years ago | on: NVD3 is back
QUOTE
I'm one of the 30 other individuals that acutally patched and commited changes for Bob to include in nvd3.js; I'm looking for contacts for the other 29 contributors. (Please contact me at using the feedback form on congocart.com or master-technology.com) I would like one of us (I'm willing to volenteer) to contact Mr. Qunibi of Novus partners in a position of consensuses from those who actually have code in the product.
My thoughts that would I believe be amicable (i.e. win/win) to both sides is that they can have our permission to take ALL of our changes closed source in the own future versions as long as we also (the community) may use the last release under the open source (Apache) license it has been under since shortly after it was released on there official novus github account and go our own separate way. I know my changes were really early to the library and some of my code may not even exist anymore (lol).
But I believe the cost for them to audit the whole library and rip out all of our changes and rewrite it all could be major -- I believe Bob could legally remove all of our code; but for the actual re-implementation Bob would have to hand it off to someone to do a fully clean-room version to make them legally safe from being sued. And that could be very costly in time and resources. Cost wise for them It might even be cheaper for them to ditch the last 6-7 months of changes and to just revert to the version before my patch/commit (which was issue #3 <G>). So I think we might be able to make this a win/win proposition if I can get the consensuses of the other 29 contributors.
Nathanael A.pebb | 13 years ago | on: Cisco Acquires Enterprise Wi-Fi Startup Meraki For $1.2 Billion In Cash
pebb | 13 years ago | on: Malware Uses Google Docs as a Proxy Server
pebb | 13 years ago | on: The High Cost of Free Office Snacks
pebb | 13 years ago | on: The High Cost of Free Office Snacks