professorgerm | 6 years ago | on: On “Armchair Epidemiology”
professorgerm's comments
professorgerm | 6 years ago | on: Why Do American Houses Have So Many Bathrooms?
The "Pittsburgh toilet"[1] is a relatively common basement feature in older homes of steel and coal industry Appalachia. Often there would be a showerhead nearby as well, and the room was intended for the worker to come home through the basement, clean off the day's grime and 'do their business' rather than dirtying the proper upstairs house. The showers are removed pretty easily but the toilets are not.
professorgerm | 6 years ago | on: What Happened with West Virginia’s Blockchain Voting Experiment?
I've never heard of other issues with the water quality in Charleston (assuming it's city water and not straight from the Kanawha), and I consider it some of the better-tasting municipal water in the Mid-Atlantic region.
professorgerm | 7 years ago | on: How China Turned a City into a Prison
Note that's not to excuse the terrible treatment of the Uighars, but to illustrate that it's not just about their religion.
[1]: http://time.com/3099950/china-muslim-hui-xinjiang-uighur-isl...
professorgerm | 7 years ago | on: Goodbye Big Five: Google
Perhaps there's a setting I've missed, but for me Apple Maps seems to "lock" onto a particular route, and if I miss a direction it'll keep trying to get me back onto that route no matter how convoluted it would be, rather than updating to the new 'best route' like Google Maps usually manages.
Other than that, which I recognize as partially user error, Apple Maps works at least as well as Google. If anything I like their routing better... so long as there's no unexpected issues.
professorgerm | 7 years ago | on: People who refuse to drink water, no matter what
Missed the second part. The article doesn't address it, but from my knowledge flavoring shouldn't affect the hydration unless the flavor includes other components like sugar/acid/salts/caffeine/etc.
[1]: https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/19/health/sparkling-water-hydrat...
professorgerm | 7 years ago | on: Why Pencils Are Yellow (2017)
professorgerm | 7 years ago | on: Delete Your Account Now: A Conversation with Jaron Lanier
professorgerm | 7 years ago | on: Ask HN: 2018 Summer Reading List?
Scott Alexander (Slatestarcodex) is related and more readable if verbose, but less focused on that groundwork material of (so-called) rationality.
professorgerm | 7 years ago | on: Amazon shareholders demand it stop selling facial recognition to governments
[1]: http://www.ipjc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/NWCRI-Annual-...
professorgerm | 7 years ago | on: High-quality schools can increase academic achievement among the poor (2010)
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is a slogan popularised by Karl Marx.
professorgerm | 7 years ago | on: GDPR for lazy people: Block all European users with Cloudflare Workers
Uber versus Night School is an example of this. Uber: Ignore taxi regulations, get tons of VC, get rich while being awful people. Night School: try to work with government and play by the rules, fail, get used as a cautionary tale.
Source: https://psmag.com/economics/night-school-failed-because-it-f...
I think something akin to GDPR is necessary and good, but GDPR as written probably isn't it. I look forward to seeing how it works out in practice, and how it develops/is replaced, and in the meantime feel bad for the developers and customers that suffer through the unintended consequences and misfeatures of it.
After the law gets clarified some, I think you're right that it won't be bad for small players. But I wouldn't want to be one of the test cases.
professorgerm | 7 years ago | on: Kroger acquires Home Chef for $200M
A standard of "scientists dabbling in journalism to improve communication" instead of "journalists dabbling in communicating science" would likely have gone a long way to improving the civilian response and trust in experts.
There's also the factor of the "Noble Lie" dishonesty around wearing masks. I suspect intellectual-ish contrarians (like Aaronson et al) are more angered by this than the average person, but we ended up with shortages and sellouts anyways: a significant number of non-experts didn't buy into that noble lie so the experts/organizations that pushed it (not to be confused with ALL experts) burned a lot of good will to basically no effect.
ETA: I considered replying to your comment about the Harvard epidemiologists but would rather edit it in here to avoid two replies to one person: I think that's a great example of my point. The story wasn't broken by bloggers, but bloggers were more likely to be amplifying the concerned experts than our "traditional media powerhouses."