prsutherland's comments

prsutherland | 29 days ago | on: Layoffs at Block

Seems like if AI is such an accelerator, leveraging 4,000 more people using AI will generate that much more shareholder value.

Any layoff that blames AI and doesn't address the fact that the company is saying it would prefer to make less, they are lying.

Rational actors should be pushing to grow when others are fearful. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

prsutherland | 5 years ago | on: Linux bans University of Minnesota for sending buggy patches in name of research

I understand the judgement calls one has to make as a moderator and I see how they are discussing the same topic.

The url for https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26887670 does not indicate that the University of Minnesota has been banned from contributing to the linux kernel. I judged that as a separate and unique part of the event.

Apologies if that isn't in alignment with how HN conversations are moderated.

prsutherland | 10 years ago | on: Cool URIs don't change (1998)

I'd still consider a 410 as a broken link. The article states

> Pretty much the only good reason for a document to disappear from the Web is that the company which owned the domain name went out of business or can no longer afford to keep the server running.

prsutherland | 13 years ago | on: Gamers deemed too fast for real-life race

I realize it is for better sensitivity and control, but the lack of shoes in the picture is amusing.

On a more serious note, maybe taking that talent and having them move up through the ranks on lower series to get the experience to go pro is a viable option. If the talent is as good as they say, then they'll do well on smaller carts and get the experience to race professionally quicker. Nissan should just make it the "senior-class" part of their program.

prsutherland | 13 years ago | on: We're Better At Design, And That's Not Good

It used to be the opposite. You could tell which was the "better" product by choosing the one with the worst appearance. The train of thought went something like, assuming the companies paid the similar amount to develop the products and the design and engineering cost a significant amount of money, then the company that didn't put the money in design put it in engineering. So uglier products were better engineered, prettier products were crap. Lenovo/IBM laptops are one of my favorite surviving examples of this phenomenon.
page 1