r0sebush's comments

What Ms. Richards has done to those 2 young men could have been much worse. She used her position in the developer/twitter community to intimidate and to cause harm to those 2 men. She knew what she was doing and the same outrage that Ms. Richards experienced, would have been the same outrage those 2 men would have received if what she did originally wasn't wrong.

She could have said that they were talking about rape or molestation and it would have been her word against theirs. They would have been hauled into jail, considered guilty and their lives would have been ruined, even though they are innocent and practicing their natural right to speak to each other.

She overheard a private conversation between 2 consenting adults and nothing was directed towards her or anybody else. She should have kept her mouth shut.

Ms. Richards or anybody with similar capability or visibility, should never be trusted in any community or group. Is the not what any group or community needs, ever.

Her actions were meant to intimidate, cause harm and censor a private conversation.

You don't. They will already know left from right. Right from wrong.

Nothing major that another person could do for less than half the cost

This event will be used as an example of why the US needs an internet kill switch and to impose more restriction on the use of the internet by US citizens. Much like the PROTECT IP act, you'll see more Laws coming out soon. Some may say this is a "false flag" event. It could even be that there are some subcontractors that worked within Lockheed that may have caused this breech. Regardless, there are going to be more restrictions coming for US citizens and companies that use the internet (in homes, schools, libraries, etc.).

Erlang.