rcar1046
|
20 hours ago
|
on: Show HN: MAGA or Not? Political alignment scores for people and companies
Thanks! At first I was using OpenAI's deep research to just give a summary and overall score 1-10, but I realized that could not be iterative and future proof as new evidence comes to light.
So after some thought, I switched to a system of individual evidence gathering and weighting each piece of evidence. I've given the models some basic starting points for types of evidence (for instance a donation has a default weight of 8/10), but have given the models leeway to make relative judgements.
After all evidence is collected, the weights and confidence that the evidence is accurate (usually very high) are put into a formula to derive a final score. No recency bias. The nitty gritty:
-Each row contributes direction × weight × confidence × status_factor, where disputed is cut in half and there is no recency decay.
-All signed contributions are summed into S, and total support mass goes into M.
Final score is 50 + 50 * (S / (M + 4)), clamped to 0-100.
-That +4 prior mass keeps thin but unanimous evidence from producing extreme scores too easily.
-Neutral evidence (direction = 0) doesn’t push the score up or down, but it does increase M, which pulls the result back toward 50.
As for the ladder - I think that is a good idea, but in a controlled manner because of the token cost and potential for abuse.
rcar1046
|
1 day ago
|
on: Show HN: MAGA or Not? Political alignment scores for people and companies
*forgot to mention there is also a chrome extension that puts scores next to Twitter/X profiles and websites as you browse waiting for approval...
rcar1046
|
1 year ago
|
on: Dikembe Mutombo has died
Someone who was ACTUALLY an even better human than [player of sport he played].
rcar1046
|
2 years ago
|
on: What has a 1 in a million chance? (2010)
Anything with a 50/50 accomplished 20 times in a row is right around 1,000,000 : 1.
rcar1046
|
2 years ago
|
on: Ask HN: Is anyone else bearish on OpenAI?
Maybe you genuinely have no use case for ChatGPT. Maybe you just haven't been creative enough to figure out how to use the tech as it currently is. Forget AGI. What it is capable of right now, for me, and countless others in countless fields of work, already saves more time per day than everything else combined. There's certainly nothing more important than my time. That's a pretty powerful product.
rcar1046
|
2 years ago
|
on: Musks Strange Behaviour Related to Ketamine
Perhaps people can feel like they have special talents or powers in one field while still feeling apprehensive and anxious when it comes to other facets of life ie. I don't know that success in business equates to confidence on the dance floor.
rcar1046
|
2 years ago
|
on: The Struggle to Make Lab-Grown Meat
I'll add to your anecdotal evidence by saying I am a vegetarian and I am interested in this. So somebody does really want this, just not people "around" you.
rcar1046
|
3 years ago
|
on: Ask HN: What are your predictions for 2023?
-Chiefs win the Super Bowl
-Bruins win the Stanley Cup
-Nets win an NBA title
-Yankees win World Series
-People continue to spell the opposite of win, incorrectly, en masse, by “sounding it out”
rcar1046
|
3 years ago
|
on: Choosing happiness
Then something must be wrong with me.
rcar1046
|
4 years ago
|
on: What to know about the stock market (2007)
Generally...he'll have to lower the price on the remaining 3 shares to sell them it looks like as there was only demand for 7 items @ $10. Or he can simply wait until someone values them at $10. Conversely, if someone is willing to buy more than is available, people will probably make more available, just at a higher price.
rcar1046
|
5 years ago
|
on: Inside a viral website
$10 PAGE RPM is the key here people. Not a great metric to go by. Ad impression RPM is the number to compare. I'd be interested to know the average number of ads/page you need to display to achieve a $10 rpm. At any rate, you can get that on AdSense no problem with very little hassle and net 30 payments.
rcar1046
|
5 years ago
|
on: A terminal stock watcher and stock position tracker
rcar1046
|
5 years ago
|
on: A terminal stock watcher and stock position tracker
This is very well done. Didn't realize Yahoo APIs were still live. I made one using IEX.
https://stockdaddy.io/samples/dashboard/
They offer an excellent API for a very reasonable price and offer it free to people if you're interested in a more comprehensive solution for free. Also, take a look at IEX if you're interested in getting into financial APIs.
rcar1046
|
5 years ago
|
on: Ask HN: What is it like to be old? What advice would you give to younger people?
Be in service to someone or something without expecting anything in return.
For me it is my dog.
rcar1046
|
5 years ago
|
on: Show HN: A Reddit reader that looks like the frontpage of a print newspaper
CSS word wrap
rcar1046
|
6 years ago
|
on: Turning my obsession in the stock market into a side project
It's configurable -
https://stockdaddy.io/dashboard/edit/IEX is pretty good with the markets they give access to, so you should be able to find most symbols (or comparable) you're looking to track.
rcar1046
|
6 years ago
|
on: Turning my obsession in the stock market into a side project
Came here to say this. It's great. I use it for my portfolio tracker -
https://stockdaddy.io/ - it's quite powerful in terms of breadth of APIs and data available.
rcar1046
|
6 years ago
|
on: US could ban 'addictive' autoplay videos and infinite scrolling online
Yes, infinite scroll is doing as much harm, if not more, than tobacco and alcohol combined. /s
rcar1046
|
6 years ago
|
on: Ask HN: Getting Started Investing
https://www.seedinvest.com is really good for this. They are the best at vetting companies and only allow a small amount (something like 3 out of 1,000) companies that apply raise funds through the Reg A (and other various regulations passed in the JOBS Act) exemption and I believe these are now available to accredited and non-accredited investors in some form.
rcar1046
|
6 years ago
|
on: How to live forever: meet the extreme life-extensionists
Think how rich the early adopters will be when the wealth they’ve accumulated to afford life extension is able to compound for 100 years.
So after some thought, I switched to a system of individual evidence gathering and weighting each piece of evidence. I've given the models some basic starting points for types of evidence (for instance a donation has a default weight of 8/10), but have given the models leeway to make relative judgements.
After all evidence is collected, the weights and confidence that the evidence is accurate (usually very high) are put into a formula to derive a final score. No recency bias. The nitty gritty:
-Each row contributes direction × weight × confidence × status_factor, where disputed is cut in half and there is no recency decay.
-All signed contributions are summed into S, and total support mass goes into M. Final score is 50 + 50 * (S / (M + 4)), clamped to 0-100.
-That +4 prior mass keeps thin but unanimous evidence from producing extreme scores too easily.
-Neutral evidence (direction = 0) doesn’t push the score up or down, but it does increase M, which pulls the result back toward 50.
As for the ladder - I think that is a good idea, but in a controlled manner because of the token cost and potential for abuse.