ssorc's comments

ssorc | 2 years ago | on: StarLite 12.5-inch Linux tablet

From the Specification section of the website:

> 1.00GHz quad-core Intel Alder Lake N200

> Turbo Boost up to 3.70GHz, with 6MB Smart Cache

ssorc | 2 years ago | on: Ask HN: How did you migrate off Evernote?

I'm in the process of migrating from Evernote to Joplin, doing a careful migration by individual notebooks (with a total of 19,959 notes in Evernote). So far it has been reasonably painless; for example, I have a few Evernote features to work out how to manage, such as text searches on scanned images. I had tried a number of other tools (Obsidian, Loqseq, Notion, Bear, Apple Notes) and Joplin seems to fit my use cases the best.

ssorc | 5 years ago | on: Garmin services and production go down after ransomware attack

You can upload the activity via PC: the FIT files are directly accessible via USB mass storage in the "Activity" directory. This allows you to upload FIT files to cloud-based services such as Strava to see your running stats, or into a PC-based application to do the same locally.

ssorc | 6 years ago | on: Fastmail – 20 Years Old

This will show you when you were first invoiced:

Settings -> Billing & Plan -> View payment history and printable invoices

2002 as well and have been extremely happy with the service.

ssorc | 6 years ago | on: Maker Faire halts operations and lays off all staff

> My subscription lapsed just about every year for some glitch or another

This exactly -- of all the magazines I subscribe to, Make has (had?) the worst subscription department by far. It was surprising given how important a subscriber base is.

ssorc | 12 years ago | on: Notes from MPUG: "Python one-liners" talk

cal works on most Unix systems, but is not part of Windows (is there a Powershell equivalent?) If you don't have cygwin (or similar) installed, these types of one-liners have saved me a number of times for quick hacks on Windows systems.

ssorc | 13 years ago | on: The Sad State of Diabetes Technology in 2012

A major reason why the accuracy on blood sugar strips is +/- 20% is because that is all that the standard (ISO 15197:2003) requires:

* Within ±0.83 mmol/L of lab results at concentrations of under 4.2 mmol/L

* Within ±20% of lab results at 4.2 mmol/L or more

Companies are juggling cost, reliability and performance/accuracy, with the first two generally winning in the marketplace as key selling points.

Some devices offer significantly better accuracy than 20%, depending on the market that you are in (not all are for sale in USA, IIRC).

page 1