throwaway21_'s comments

throwaway21_ | 4 years ago | on: The leader who's standing up to China

Maybe you should follow your own advice - your numbers are wildly inflated (can easily be checked at Wikipedia), Ukrainians weren't the only ones in USSR who were starving to death and they were part of USSR leadership as any other nation there (with Stalin being Georgian). And frankly, idea that you're going to judge who is fit to comment is highly delusional.

throwaway21_ | 4 years ago | on: Twitter’s founder admits that shutting down the API was “worst thing we did”

Everybody is doing that. Even here on the HN you'll get shadow banned - couple of weeks ago whole thread that someone else started just disappeared. I become aware of that only when searching for my own message from that thread. It was semi-controversial issue but nothing in that thread (at least at the time I saw its content for the last time) warranted that. Basically what I'm seeing as a HN is just a view that someone else curates.

throwaway21_ | 4 years ago | on: President Daniels responds to Chinese student's harassment

You mean you want US to be even more jingoistic? It won't be an easy task for sure as I'm reading propaganda pieces almost every day for a last few years in a places that earlier were almost politics free (ars technica, hn...) - regular new sites not to mention.

throwaway21_ | 4 years ago | on: Julian Assange can be extradited to the US, court rules

Why would he do any time at all? Because the people who actually should be doing time are the people in power so they are somehow immune?

Also, Chelsea could transition to a woman without prison too. The fact that they ended/will end in prison while people who actually committed crimes that these two (and Snowden) exposed speaks volumes about how fundamentally different USA is.

throwaway21_ | 4 years ago | on: A Chinese-Built Highway Drove Montenegro into Crippling Debt

Yeah, EU investing money - good, China investing money - bad.

- Why it's bad?

- Because they get influence over government.

- But EU also gets even more influence when they invest money and finance myriads of NGOs?

- Yeah, but that's different - we are the good guys and they are bad (even when we're doing same thing).

throwaway21_ | 4 years ago | on: Belarus 'diverts Ryanair flight to arrest journalist', opposition says

Passengers were in danger in a same way passengers are in danger over New York if pilot refuses ATC directions.

Yeah, Morales's pilot could choose a different path provided there's air refueling available. Otherwise it had to land somewhere, and then airplane was searched. I'm pretty sure there are conventions that forbid that kind behavior against diplomatic personal.

So, in the end, we are again at the same place - when we ignore conventions that's perfectly fine, and when they do the same it's a completely different.

btw read first article of Chicago convention, then check what sovereignty means.

throwaway21_ | 4 years ago | on: O'Leary: Forced landing in Belarus was 'state-sponsored hijacking'

A said 'right' in the sense that they are free to do it like any other state - Lukashenko isn't nice guy at all but he didn't do anything unusual here - shooting that plane down would be extraordinary, but forcing it to land isn't significantly different than crap that was brought down on Assange or Snowden.

throwaway21_ | 4 years ago | on: O'Leary: Forced landing in Belarus was 'state-sponsored hijacking'

Don't be silly - Belarus is a sovereign state, they control their airspace and they had every right to land that plane down. Assange made US looked stupid in that incident while Lukashenko made Protasevich looked stupid yesterday.

btw nobody sane is believing that US wouldn't force to land plane flying over US with Snowden in it - but Snowden isn't that stupid I guess.

throwaway21_ | 4 years ago | on: Belarus 'diverts Ryanair flight to arrest journalist', opposition says

Nope, that airplane was in Belarus airspace so it's up to them to decide if they want it landed or not. If you don't like it nobody is forcing you to fly over Belarus. Their airspace - their rules.

Same thing happened on 9/11 - US chose do land all aircrafts, and in case that anyone disobeyed orders it would be promptly shot down - foreign planes or not, it didn't matter in slightest.

throwaway21_ | 4 years ago | on: Belarus 'diverts Ryanair flight to arrest journalist', opposition says

Yeah, you have such a great legacy when defending democracy all over the world even in cases where you were absolutely dominant military power that this one would be walk in a park - Russia would just stand down, peacefully looking NATO invading its ally on its doorstep. Fortunately no-one in NATO has such illusions.

throwaway21_ | 4 years ago | on: Belarus 'diverts Ryanair flight to arrest journalist', opposition says

No, they certainly didn't have to land in Austria. But somehow, god knows why, certain countries closed their airspace for that specific plane. I'm inclined to belive that more countries would suddenly close their airspace too if plane chose not to land in Austria but to go to some country where Snowden won't be in danger of being arrested - France, Spain, Portugal and Italy are hardly the only one that would bow under US pressure.
page 1